美国论文代写价格：董事

美国论文代写价格：董事

利益冲突是指一种情况，使董事在一种情况下，他们滥用他们的功能或指定，以获得个人。如果一个特定的选择，预计将带来优势的董事，有人谁是与董事，特别是董事，因此不是在到达一个公正的决定和房委会的利益冲突的条件。一般说，董事们在特定的科目上有利益冲突。例如，董事会投票表决，以增加在银行存款的人的利息率，其中有由同一家银行的董事所持有的存款。被材料的程度从一种情况变化到另一种情况（澳大利亚公司董事学会，2012）。
底线是包含在一般的法律以及法律规定的有关利益冲突的职责主要是迎合的角色由导演对公司利益的表现，同时不滥用他们的地位，为个人利益（的认出，2014）。
在董事的地位，一个人可以访问的信息，可用于为自己赚取利润。由于董事所受尊敬的职位，不使用该职位的职位获得利润是相当重要的。在的情况下，使他们获得从一个导演的功能的知识或信息主管进行滥用，或为个人利益的公司挪用资金，为时代的法院会把这些收益和利润为公司利润的大部分，比导演的个人收益。此外，这个责任不盈利也延伸到从道德和承担方式，优势的收益一样，佣金或受贿，在返回一个契约进行了有利（的认出，2014）。

美国论文代写价格：董事

Conflict of interest refers to a situation, which places the director in a situation, where they misuse their function or designation to gain personally. In case a specific choice is expected to bring advantages to the director, to someone who is associated with director, the particular director therefore is not in the condition of arriving at an unbiased decision and ha s a conflict of interest. It is general that the directors have a conflict of interest on specific subjects. For instance, voting done by the directors towards increasing the rate of interest that is given to the people who have deposits in the bank, where there are deposits held by the directors in the same bank. The degree of the interest being material varies from one situation to another (Australian Institute of Company Directors, 2012).
The bottom line that is encompassed in the general law as well as statutory provisions pertaining to the duty of conflict of interest mainly caters to the performance of the role by the director towards the company’s benefit, and at the same time not misusing their position for making personal gains (The FindLaw, 2014).
In the position of a director, a person is allowed to access the information that can be used for making profits for themselves. Due to the respected position held by a director, this duty of not using the position for gaining a profit is quite significant. In the situations that a director misuse of the knowledge or information that they acquire from the function of a director, or carries out misappropriation of the funds of the company for making personal gains, for majority of the times the courts would treat such gains and profits as company’s profit, than the personal gains of the director. In addition, this duty of not making profits as well extends to the gains and advantages incurring from immoral ways, like, acceptance of commissions or bribes, as a favour in return of a deed conducted (The FindLaw, 2014).