加拿大 代写：经济学

加拿大 代写：经济学

选择的第一篇文章是Tullock G.(1984)的《公共利益理论的(部分)复兴》，这篇文章与公共利益理论有关。选择的第二篇文章是Winden, F.V.(1999)的《论利益集团的经济理论:迈向政治经济学中的一个群体参照系》，这篇文章与经济利益集团理论有关。这些文章将按照评价来源的五项标准标准进行评价。评估的五个标准是货币、可靠性、覆盖面、准确性和作者资格。考虑到货币的标准，这篇文章发表于1999年。它可以被认为是适合本研究的目的，并已被确定为Kluwer学术出版的财产。考虑到可靠性的标准，本文作者Frans Van Winden是阿姆斯特丹经济学院教授经济学，也是位于阿姆斯特丹大学认知科学中心的个人兴趣所在。主要研究方向为实验经济学、神经经济学、行为经济学和政治经济学。
因此，可靠性的标准可以被认为是适合的研究。在此基础上，还可以验证作者的凭据。考虑到覆盖范围的标准，本文考虑对经济利益集团理论的建立进行评价。尽管已经取得了重大的进展，但在知识方面仍然存在着足够的实质性缺陷，然而，有人认为这个问题的部分原因在于公共选择理论的发展。方法论的个人主义导致了对人类行为的过分个人化的看法。此外，人们对不完全信息的重要性认识不足。因此，可以认为本文的准确性适合本研究的目的。考虑到准确性的标准，这篇研究文章得到了该领域内一些作者的观点和事实的支持。通过对不同文献的考虑，对研究的每一个次要事实的验证都是按照所提供的文本内文献进行的。

加拿大 代写：经济学

The first article selected is “A (partial) rehabilitation of the public interest theory”, by Tullock G. (1984) that is related to Public Interest Theory. The second article selected is “On the economic theory of interest groups: Towards a group frame of reference in political economics” by Winden, F.V. (1999) that is related to the Economic Interest Group Theory. These articles will be evaluated in accordance with the five standard criteria for evaluation of sources. The five criteria of evaluation are currency, reliability, coverage, accuracy and author credentials.Considering the criteria of currency, the article was published in the year 1999. It can be considered appropriate for the purpose of this research, and it has been identified as the property of Kluwer Academic Publishing. Considering the criteria of reliability, the author of this article Frans Van Winden is a professor of Amsterdam School of Economics teaching economics, and is also the personal interest at the Cognitive Science Centre that is located at the University of Amsterdam. His key interests of research area are in the fields of experimental economics, neuron-economics, behavioural economics and political economics.
Hence, the criteria of reliability can be considered as appropriate for the research. Based on this, the credentials of the author can be verified as well. Considering the criteria of coverage, this article has considered evaluating the establishment of economic interest group theories. Even though significant progress has been, there is existence of sufficient substantial lacunae within the knowledge, yet arguing that part of this issue is the way in which there is development of the public choice theory. The individualism of methodology has resulted in providing an over-individualized view about the behaviour of humans. In addition, there has been an underexposure of the significance of imperfect information. Hence, it can be stated that the accuracy of this article is appropriate for the purpose of this research. Considering the criteria of accuracy, the research article has been supported by the views and facts stated by a number of authors within the field. The verification of each and every secondary fact of the research by the consideration of different references are in accordance with the in-text references provided.