代写论文：响应性的总结

代写论文：响应性的总结

“公共卫生:糖毒性真相”是由R的一篇文章。H鲁斯,C.D消失和L。Schimdt,发表在《自然》杂志在2012年的一个版本。R.H拉斯帝格是临床儿科学教授,专门从事儿童肥胖在加州大学,旧金山。C.D消失直接菲利普·r·李卫生政策研究所根据加州大学旧金山分校,消失和L。一个Schimdt教授。

“酒后驾车和被动吸烟死亡人数分别呈现坚固的酒精和烟草控制参数。长期的医疗、经济和人力费用糖代谢综合征头寸在同一类别”(拉斯帝格,等。2012年,11页)。

作者带来的主要关心的公共卫生:有毒的真相糖的糖对健康带来的不利影响,要求限制糖消费酒精消费的情况。联合国宣称,慢性非传染性综合征现在构成一个大的健康逆境比传染性的。文章进一步分析,每一个世界的一部分,依靠西方饮食这样对健康造成不良影响。

拉斯帝格、消失和Schimdt表示在他们的研究中,这些国家见证了徒步旅行的肥胖和相关疾病。联合国宣布针对酒精和烟草和饮食不当,非传染性疾病的主要风险因素。作者提出一个关键响应联合国的声明表示,酒精和烟草监管但不饮食。由于宪法自由和自由生活的全球概念化,作者表明,调节饮食不是西方饮食的方法,而是识别事实需要干预,其次是适当的限制。本文突出,主要集中在逆境中添加糖。

代写论文：响应性的总结

‘Public Heath: The Toxic Truth about Sugar’ is an article by R.H Lustig, C.D Brindis and L.A Schimdt, which was published in Nature in one of its 2012 editions. R.H Lustig is a professor of clinical paediatrics, specializing in childhood obesity at University of California, San Francisco. C.D Brindis direct the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy under UCSF, where both Brindis and L.A Schimdt are professors.

“Drunk-driving and passive smoking fatalities render sturdy arguments for alcohol and tobacco control respectively. The prolonged health-care, economic and human expenses on metabolic syndrome positions sugar in the same category” (Lustig, et al. 2012, p 11).

The primary concern posed by the authors in ‘Public Heath: The Toxic Truth about Sugar’ is the adverse effects posed by sugar on health, which demands restriction on sugar consumption as is the case with alcohol consumption.  The United Nations declared that chronic non-communicable syndromes now pose a large health adversity than infectious ones. The article further analyses that every part of the world, which relies on Western diet is subject to such adverse effects on health.

Lustig, Brindis and Schimdt denote in their research that such countries witnessed hiking rates of obesity and relevant diseases. The announcement of United Nations aimed at alcohol and tobacco and improper diet as primary risk elements of non-communicable diseases. The authors suggest a critical response to the UN announcement by denoting that alcohol and tobacco are regulated but not diet. Owing to constitutional freedom and global conceptualization of free living, the contributors suggest that regulation of diet is not the approach but rather identification of Western dietary facts that need intervention, followed by appropriate imposition of restriction is. The article prominently and majorly focuses on the adversity of added sugar.