加拿大代写论文

新西兰国际关系学论文代写:世界体系

新西兰国际关系学论文代写:世界体系

博伦标识一个跨国家的证据表明国家在世界体系中他告知依赖理论在20世纪60年代中后期,巴西、沙乌地阿拉伯、伊朗、韩国、阿根廷、海地均在半边缘或外围国家的范畴,有政治非民主制度。此外,在同一时期,印度、特立尼达、多巴哥、斯里兰卡、牙买加和巴巴多斯被认为是从属地位,但他们有一个民主的政治体制。因此,博伦认为,分析国家根据世界体系理论可以给出不准确的结果,这些政治因素影响该国的经济增长是一个重要的问题,可以提供混合分析结果。这实际上是正确的,因为一些国家在类似的位置,另一个可以有相同的经济地位,但有完全不同的特点,这将采取他们在两种不同的方式,并从世界系统分析理论得出的理论结果反驳。除了这些参数外,我们还应该注意到,一个核心国家在变得发达后,会更愿意给予援助而不是接受援助。在发达国家和穷国的资金流动和国际援助的国际组织中,核心和发达国家也会有更多的发言权,这使得分析更加片面和片面,没有把这些因素作为参考点。博伦进一步确定了南非在早期的60年代中期,半外围国家但其白人相比,黑人有更高质量的生活方式。白人人口受教育,拥有大量财富,但黑人生活在贫困或依赖国家,几乎没有教育,没有初级医疗服务,生活质量低。这些因素是国内的,这表明资金注入社会建设基础设施的不当分配。这些差异在同一个国家存在,因为南非的内部政策,它代表了国家成为一个非核心地位的世界体系理论。因此,内部差异也往往偏离世界系统理论的分析结果,应被视为一个因素,可能会导致分析具有可变的角度。

新西兰国际关系学论文代写:世界体系

Bollen identifies a cross-national evidence of countries acting under the world system dependency theory in which he informs that during the mid to late 1960s, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Iran, South Korea, Argentina, and Haiti were in the semi-periphery or a periphery country category which had a non-democratic system of politics. In addition, in the same time period, India, Trinidad and Tobago, Sri Lanka, Jamaica, and Barbados were considered to be in the dependent position but they had a democratic system of politics. Thus Bollen argues that analysing countries according to the world system theory could give inaccurate results as these political factors affecting the country’s growth is a major concern and may provide mixed analysis results. This is in fact correct as some countries in similar position to another one could have the same economic position but have completely different traits which will take them in two different ways ahead and disprove the theoretical results obtained from the world system analysis theory. Apart from these parameters, it is also to be noticed that a core country would be more than willing to give aid than to receive after it becomes a developed country. The core and developed countries would also have more say in the international organizations governing the flow of funds and international aid to developing and poor countries, and this makes the analysis more biased and one-sided without taking these factors as reference points. Bollen further identifies that South Africa was a semi-peripheral country in the early mid 60’s but its white population had a much higher quality of lifestyle compared to the blacks. The white population were educated and had substantial wealth but the black population were living as if living in a poor or a dependent country and had little or no education, no primary healthcare services, and low quality of life. These factors are internal to country which indicates the inappropriate allocation of fund infusion into social building infrastructure. These differences in the same country existed because of South Africa’s internal policies and it represented the country into a non-core status in the world system theory. Thus, the internal differences also tend to deviate the analysis results of the world system theory and should be considered as a factor that may cause the analysis to have variable perspective.