英国考文垂论文代写：城市建筑
英国考文垂论文代写：城市建筑
如果大纲的知识提取从福柯到电力目前研究较多的都市生活中，人们可以感觉到一个突出的极端权力的不确定性以及对社会秩序的延续其不一致的影响。“治理”是由福勒承认人体的重要性与福柯思想，对生物的政治力量和政治影响的复杂的空间和社会空间的各种物质变化。各种学者的工作是在物质历史，身体的政治经济之间的重新介入的症状。
尼古拉斯考虑从主权豁免程序变得有时掩盖了相当普遍的现象总体逻辑结构下（Rose，2001）。人们应该与那些最小的，看不见的或“模糊”的地区，暴露压力或异常的力量支撑当代城市的架构。因此，一个明确的“定位”或“空间的物化的力量背道而驰的挤压形态在区域，避免在电力传输任何方向或层次的一些新结构主义和“根茎”的思想经历了。
结合福柯的重点是从主体转移到结论，必要的理解，制作推广收集更多的混凝土和某些表现的生物政治世界。文献对都市的复杂性，思想，然而，被限制在设计相关问题的倾向，必须彻底地连接到福柯视觉权力或大史学欣赏众多技术的城市记录对应的身体的社会政治。的迪尔茨，安得烈突出在多重自治而不是辩证的实体，例如，显然是在与一个理性的本体，包括文化和历史评价实施的可能性。
英国考文垂论文代写：城市建筑
If outline the intellectual extraction from Foucault to more current studies of power in urban life, people could sense a prominence on the extreme indeterminacy of power as well as its inconsistent effects for the continuation of social order. The Foucauldian idea of ‘governmentality’ has to be matched by a fuller acknowledgment of the materiality of the human body, the variety of spatial materializations of bio-political strength and the political effects of spatial and social intricacy. The work of various scholars is symptomatic of a revived involvement among material histories, political economy of the body.
Nikolas account of procedures of exemption from sovereign power becomes sometimes to obscure considerably general phenomena under an overarching logical structure (Rose, 2001). People should engage with those minimal, unseen or ‘indistinct’ areas that expose stress or abnormalities in the architecture of power underpinning the contemporary city. Hence, a clear ‘localization’ or spatialization to the materialization of power that runs counter to the squashing morphologies experienced in some neo- structuralist and ‘rhizomatic’ ideas of area which avoid any directionality or hierarchy in the transmission of power.
By uniting the essential understandings of Foucault the emphasis is shifted from main body to conclusion, expansively fabricated generalizations to a collection of more concrete and certain manifestations of the bio-political world. Literatures on ideas of metropolitan complexity, nevertheless, had the tendency to be limited to design-related problems, and have to be thoroughly connected to either Foucauldian vision of power or bigger historiographic appreciation of the numerous techniques of urban record corresponding to the social politics of the body. The Dilts, Andrew’s prominence on multiplicities as self-governing instead of dialectical entities, for instance, is apparently at odds with the implementation of a rationalist ontology that could comprise cultural and historic evaluation.
