代写被发现：逻辑列表和结构

代写被发现：逻辑列表和结构

对于逻辑列表和结构，论文被标记为4分(满分5分)。每一段的连词都能使人很清楚地理解主题句和结论。此外，结构整洁，没有长段落。因此，它使事情更容易理解，也更容易识别主题。它甚至可以为将来的参考提供帮助。语言有两个方面。语法、拼写和标点符号的使用-这是标记为5，其中1是最低的，5是最高的。内容的连贯性，包括语言表达和语调-这是标记为5,1和5分别是最低和最高。关于语法、拼写和标点符号，我给它打了1分(满分5分)。虽然它是简洁和有趣的分析，语法是非常糟糕的。拼写错误到处都是。

代写被发现：逻辑列表和结构
这里有一个例子:首先，当一个跨国公司想要在一个新的国家植入子公司，他们必须尊重劳动法和国家的条件，有一个良好的形象。事实上，如果跨国公司从一开始就与之发生冲突，他们就不能在新的国家正确发展子公司，因为新的国家的人对品牌的印象不好。我们知道，随着营销力量的增强，品牌形象对消费者来说是非常重要的。红色高亮表示拼写错误，黄色高亮表示语法错误。第二段的第一行完全没有意义。这是没有意义的，它确实偏离了最初的主题，使事情变得混乱。答案的其余部分也有类似的错误，这使情况变得更糟。由于时态混淆，语法又一次变差了。使用这个词也不值得称赞。

代写被发现：逻辑列表和结构

For the logical listing and structuring, the paper has been marked 4 out of 5. The conjunctions used in every paragraph make things very clear to understand the topic sentences and the conclusion. Also, the structuring is neat and there are no long paragraphs. Hence, it makes things easier to understand and also to identify the topics easily. It could even be helpful for future referencing. There are two aspects under language. Usage of grammar, spelling and punctuation – This is marked for 5 where 1 is the lowest and 5 is the highest. Coherence in content including language delivery and tone – This is marked for 5 with 1 and 5 being the lowest and highest respectively. With respect to grammar, spelling and punctuation, I have marked it 1 out of 5. Although it is concise and interesting to analyze, the grammar is extremely poor. Spelling mistakes are present everywhere.

代写被发现：逻辑列表和结构
Here is an example:Firstly, when a multination wants implant subsidiaries in a new country, they must respect the labor law and condition of the country to have a good image.Indeed, if the multination are in conflict with this since the beginning, they can’t correctly develop their subsidiaries in the new country, because people of the new countries have a bad image of the brand. We know that now with the augmentation of the marketing powers, the brand image is very important to the consumer.Red highlights are the spelling errors and yellow highlights are the grammar errors. The first line in the second paragraph is totally meaningless. It doesn’t make sense and it indeed deviates from the original topic making things confusing. The rest of the answer also has similar such errors that make the scenario worst. The grammar is once again poor as the tenses are mixed up. The word usage is also not commendable.