毕业论文代写：案例分析

在： ,

毕业论文代写：案例分析

第一步是分析当做出决定时所发生的后果。功利主义认为，行为的结果可能证明行为是正当的。现在简可以相信她的经验，而不用在库存系统上签字了。这样做的话，她的公司可能会破产。客户公司将从她的行为中受益，因为他们将在未来得到潜在软件灾难的警告。另一方面，如果Jane在库存系统上签字，知道他们已经达到了约定的标准，那么客户公司以后就会遇到问题，但是Jane的公司会被挽救。两家公司可能面临同样的后果。如果简的公司不把产品卖给客户，他们可能会倒闭。然而，如果产品被注销，而客户公司稍后面临问题，那么他们也可能被迫停业。ACS行为准则的第二个价值是，IT开发人员必须始终以某种方式工作，以确保他们开发的产品在某种程度上改善了将受到产品影响的个人的生活质量(ACS, 2014)。
所以现在要解决的问题是，如果客户端使用Jane正在签署的软件产品，是否会有更好的生活质量?案例研究表明，该系统已经通过了所有合同规定的测试，简的雇主也放心让她签字。在法律上，她没有遇到客户要求的测试和软件开发公司也同意完成的测试等难题。然而，在个人和道德上，她面临着一个难题，因为以她多年的经验，她知道子库存系统的风险仍然存在，而且这些风险也可能对客户和员工造成重大伤害(尽管他们的生命没有危险)。潜在的失败可能使他们遭受损失，因此，即使他们没有受到直接的身体伤害，他们的生活质量也将受到间接的损害。

毕业论文代写：案例分析

The first step is to analyze the consequences of what happens when a decision is made. Utilitarianism states that the consequences of actions might justify the actions. Now Jane could trust her experience and not sign off on the inventory system. By doing so, her company would potentially run out of business. The client company would benefit from her actions as they would be alerted to a potential software disaster for them in the future. On the other hand, if Jane was to sign off on the inventory system knowing they had met the agreed upon standards, then client company would face issues later, but Jane’s company would be saved. Both companies might face equal ramifications. Jane’s company might go out of business if they don’t sign off the product to client. However, if the product is signed off and the client company faces issues later, then they could also be forced out of business. The second value of the ACS code of conduct states that the IT developer must always work in a way that would ensure their developed product in some way improved the quality of life for the individuals who would be affected by the product (ACS, 2014).
So now the question to address is, if the client would have better quality of life with the software product that Jane is signing off? The case study indicates that the system has passed all the contracted tests and Jane is reassured by her employers to sign off.Legally she is under no conundrum as such as what tests were required by the client and what the software development company agreed too has been completed. However, personal and ethically she is facing a conundrum because with her years of experience she knows that sub inventory system risks still exist and these risks could as well lead to significant harm for client and employees (albeit their lives are not in danger). The potential failure could make them suffer losses and hence their quality of life will be impaired indirectly even if they do not suffer a direct physical injury as such.

加拿大论文网：工程设计

在： ,

加拿大论文网：工程设计

工程设计也可以与任何决策过程相关联。工程设计一般包括以下五个关键步骤,1)发展问题的声明或一组规范,2)收集信息相关的问题,3)设计几个方案,满足规格,4)分析替代和选择最好的一个,和5)测试和实现最好的设计。在工程设计中，一开始就要考虑设计的关键目标，这是通过需求集合和客户端输入来实现的。在伦理决策的情况下，确定的关键目标通常是解决伦理困境的需要。在工程设计中，目标通常是根据可能需要的最终交付形式来确定的。在伦理困境的情况下，行为的后果通常是被理解的，并根据行为的后果设定目标。目标可能是在伦理困境的背景下避免对甲方产生负面影响。工程设计中确定了不同的利益相关者。他们是那些直接受到新软件产品创建影响的人。在道德决策困境的情况下，必须再次确定不同的利益相关者谁将受到决策的影响。
在工程设计中，主要利益相关者和次要利益相关者是根据某种格式确定的。例如，使用可能是对涉众进行分类的标准。例如，根据使用情况，他们中的一些人将被划分为主要的涉众，并且他们可能会最大限度地利用所开发的系统。在伦理决策中，如果决策的目的是增加收益，那么主要利益相关者就是能够产生最大积极结果的利益相关者。或者，在其他一些情况下，主要利益相关者可以被定义为当目的是通过决策减少不利影响时，遭受较少负面后果的人。次要涉众可能是不使用系统的人，但是他们在组织中的工作可能会因为系统而稍微修改。在道德决策过程中，较小的利益相关者是在做出决策时最小的利益相关者。

加拿大论文网：工程设计

Engineering design can also be associated with any decision making process processes. Engineering design generally involves the following five key steps, 1) developing a statement of the problem or a set of specifications, 2) gathering information pertinent to the problem, 3) designing several alternatives that meet the specifications, 4) analyzing the alternatives and selecting the best one, and 5) testing and implementing the best design.In engineering design, the key goals of the design are considered at the onset, and this is done by means of requirement collections and with client input. In the case of the ethical decision making, the key goal identified is usually the need for a solution to an ethical dilemma.In engineering design, the goal is usually set based on the form of final delivery that might be needed. In the case of ethical dilemmas, the consequence of action is usually understood and based on the consequence of the action, the goals might be set. A goal might be to avoid negative ramifications to party A in the context of an ethical dilemma.Different stakeholders are identified in engineering design. They are the ones directly affected by a new software product creation. In the case of the ethical decision making dilemma, once again different stakeholders have to be identified who would be affected by the decision.
The major stakeholders and the minor one identified in engineering design based on some format. For instance, usage might be a criterion to classify the stakeholders. Based on usage for instance, some of them would be classified as major stakeholders, and they would probably make the maximum use of the system developed. In ethical decision making, a major stakeholder is one that would have maximum positive consequences, if the purpose of decision making is to increase the benefits. Alternatively the major stakeholder in some other situations can be defined as one that suffer less negative consequences when the purpose is to reduce adverse effects by decision making. A minor stakeholder might be someone that does not use the system, but might perhaps have their working in an organization modified slightly because of the system. In the case of the ethical decision making process, the minor stakeholder is one who would be least when a decision is made.