加拿大代写essay

加拿大论文网:工程设计

加拿大论文网:工程设计

工程设计也可以与任何决策过程相关联。工程设计一般包括以下五个关键步骤,1)发展问题的声明或一组规范,2)收集信息相关的问题,3)设计几个方案,满足规格,4)分析替代和选择最好的一个,和5)测试和实现最好的设计。在工程设计中,一开始就要考虑设计的关键目标,这是通过需求集合和客户端输入来实现的。在伦理决策的情况下,确定的关键目标通常是解决伦理困境的需要。在工程设计中,目标通常是根据可能需要的最终交付形式来确定的。在伦理困境的情况下,行为的后果通常是被理解的,并根据行为的后果设定目标。目标可能是在伦理困境的背景下避免对甲方产生负面影响。工程设计中确定了不同的利益相关者。他们是那些直接受到新软件产品创建影响的人。在道德决策困境的情况下,必须再次确定不同的利益相关者谁将受到决策的影响。
在工程设计中,主要利益相关者和次要利益相关者是根据某种格式确定的。例如,使用可能是对涉众进行分类的标准。例如,根据使用情况,他们中的一些人将被划分为主要的涉众,并且他们可能会最大限度地利用所开发的系统。在伦理决策中,如果决策的目的是增加收益,那么主要利益相关者就是能够产生最大积极结果的利益相关者。或者,在其他一些情况下,主要利益相关者可以被定义为当目的是通过决策减少不利影响时,遭受较少负面后果的人。次要涉众可能是不使用系统的人,但是他们在组织中的工作可能会因为系统而稍微修改。在道德决策过程中,较小的利益相关者是在做出决策时最小的利益相关者。

加拿大论文网:工程设计

Engineering design can also be associated with any decision making process processes. Engineering design generally involves the following five key steps, 1) developing a statement of the problem or a set of specifications, 2) gathering information pertinent to the problem, 3) designing several alternatives that meet the specifications, 4) analyzing the alternatives and selecting the best one, and 5) testing and implementing the best design.In engineering design, the key goals of the design are considered at the onset, and this is done by means of requirement collections and with client input. In the case of the ethical decision making, the key goal identified is usually the need for a solution to an ethical dilemma.In engineering design, the goal is usually set based on the form of final delivery that might be needed. In the case of ethical dilemmas, the consequence of action is usually understood and based on the consequence of the action, the goals might be set. A goal might be to avoid negative ramifications to party A in the context of an ethical dilemma.Different stakeholders are identified in engineering design. They are the ones directly affected by a new software product creation. In the case of the ethical decision making dilemma, once again different stakeholders have to be identified who would be affected by the decision.
The major stakeholders and the minor one identified in engineering design based on some format. For instance, usage might be a criterion to classify the stakeholders. Based on usage for instance, some of them would be classified as major stakeholders, and they would probably make the maximum use of the system developed. In ethical decision making, a major stakeholder is one that would have maximum positive consequences, if the purpose of decision making is to increase the benefits. Alternatively the major stakeholder in some other situations can be defined as one that suffer less negative consequences when the purpose is to reduce adverse effects by decision making. A minor stakeholder might be someone that does not use the system, but might perhaps have their working in an organization modified slightly because of the system. In the case of the ethical decision making process, the minor stakeholder is one who would be least when a decision is made.