毕业论文代写：案例分析
毕业论文代写：案例分析
第一步是分析当做出决定时所发生的后果。功利主义认为，行为的结果可能证明行为是正当的。现在简可以相信她的经验，而不用在库存系统上签字了。这样做的话，她的公司可能会破产。客户公司将从她的行为中受益，因为他们将在未来得到潜在软件灾难的警告。另一方面，如果Jane在库存系统上签字，知道他们已经达到了约定的标准，那么客户公司以后就会遇到问题，但是Jane的公司会被挽救。两家公司可能面临同样的后果。如果简的公司不把产品卖给客户，他们可能会倒闭。然而，如果产品被注销，而客户公司稍后面临问题，那么他们也可能被迫停业。ACS行为准则的第二个价值是，IT开发人员必须始终以某种方式工作，以确保他们开发的产品在某种程度上改善了将受到产品影响的个人的生活质量(ACS, 2014)。
所以现在要解决的问题是，如果客户端使用Jane正在签署的软件产品，是否会有更好的生活质量?案例研究表明，该系统已经通过了所有合同规定的测试，简的雇主也放心让她签字。在法律上，她没有遇到客户要求的测试和软件开发公司也同意完成的测试等难题。然而，在个人和道德上，她面临着一个难题，因为以她多年的经验，她知道子库存系统的风险仍然存在，而且这些风险也可能对客户和员工造成重大伤害(尽管他们的生命没有危险)。潜在的失败可能使他们遭受损失，因此，即使他们没有受到直接的身体伤害，他们的生活质量也将受到间接的损害。
毕业论文代写：案例分析
The first step is to analyze the consequences of what happens when a decision is made. Utilitarianism states that the consequences of actions might justify the actions. Now Jane could trust her experience and not sign off on the inventory system. By doing so, her company would potentially run out of business. The client company would benefit from her actions as they would be alerted to a potential software disaster for them in the future. On the other hand, if Jane was to sign off on the inventory system knowing they had met the agreed upon standards, then client company would face issues later, but Jane’s company would be saved. Both companies might face equal ramifications. Jane’s company might go out of business if they don’t sign off the product to client. However, if the product is signed off and the client company faces issues later, then they could also be forced out of business. The second value of the ACS code of conduct states that the IT developer must always work in a way that would ensure their developed product in some way improved the quality of life for the individuals who would be affected by the product (ACS, 2014).
So now the question to address is, if the client would have better quality of life with the software product that Jane is signing off? The case study indicates that the system has passed all the contracted tests and Jane is reassured by her employers to sign off.Legally she is under no conundrum as such as what tests were required by the client and what the software development company agreed too has been completed. However, personal and ethically she is facing a conundrum because with her years of experience she knows that sub inventory system risks still exist and these risks could as well lead to significant harm for client and employees (albeit their lives are not in danger). The potential failure could make them suffer losses and hence their quality of life will be impaired indirectly even if they do not suffer a direct physical injury as such.
