英国论文延期：社会构建主义

英国论文延期：社会构建主义

会计进一步外部现实视图与个人问题。这些问题包括现实的经济学可以提出和外部自然的现实主义。这些矛盾问题,被认为是必不可少的方式。关键的问题是,系统处理对象的物理性质和对象的会计在类似的方式(Kakkuri-Knuuttila et al ., 2008)。潜在的假设的方式,可以减少一切一个物理性质的过程,但这种假设需要被删除。许多对象的会计等优点被社会建构和没有一个独立的存在与物理对象。会计对象的存在已经相当依赖会计规则以及流程。这些类型的规则获得通过设置过滤和体力劳动,这就是为什么他们是社会建构的对象(李,2006)。社会建设的对象存在,但它们并不是独立账户的人类。

英国论文延期：社会构建主义
应用程序的规则以及会计的过程,其中包括主观性质的因素塑造经济现实的图像。采用这种观点建构主义的主要范式解释的支持者。根据迈耶(1983),描绘,组织并发症。这种并发症包括机构与几个原因和技术不断扩张的断开连接的性质(Mouck 2004)。然而,会计本质,它迫使边界的概念性质是一样的。描述使用定义解决问题,获得这样的界限,这意味着要考虑现实收购的公司。据海恩斯(2002),描绘了,账户内金融性质的公司并不是唯一的数据通信公司,但他们也描述如何通过边界描述组织建设中扮演着重要的角色(Ahrens et al .,2006)。

英国论文延期：社会构建主义

Accounting further has an external reality view with its individual issues. These issues are inclusive of the way in which reality of economics can be presented and realism of external nature. These are ambivalent issues and considered as essential ways. The key issue is that the system deals with objects of physical nature and objects of accounting in similar fashion (Kakkuri-Knuuttila et al., 2008). The assumption of latent manner is that it is possible to diminish everything to a process of physical nature, but this assumption needs to be removed. Many objects of accounting such as advantages have been socially constructed and do not have an independent existence unlike physical objects. The existence of accounting objects has a considerable dependence over rules of accounting as well as processes. These types of rules obtain filter and are set through physical labor, and this is the reason why they are objects of social construction (Lee, 2006). Objects of social construction are present, but they are not independent of their accounts of humans.

英国论文延期：社会构建主义
Application of rules as well as processes of accounting are such that they include factors of subjective nature shaping the economic reality image. This view of constructionism is adopted majorly though paradigm of interpretive supporters. According to Meyer (1983), it has been depicted that an organization has complication. This complication consists of institutions that continuously sprawl with several reasons and technologies of disconnected nature (Mouck 2004). However, accounting has such a nature that it forces boundaries of conceptual nature over the same. The accounts depict the use of definitions for settling matters and to obtain such boundaries, it implies to consider reality acquisition for firms. According to Hines (2002), it has been depicted that accounts of financial nature within firms are not the only ones to communicate data of a company, but they also depict how organization construction plays an essential role through boundaries description (Ahrens et al., 2006).