加拿大人权学论文代写：法案
加拿大人权学论文代写：法案
任何人的普遍责任是帮助另一个有需要的人或紧急情况下的人，而无需求助。这种在每个人中流行的好撒马利亚人的倾向已经慢慢开始消失。是不是因为现在人们变得更物质化了呢？或者是否每个人都在考虑帮助别人，而义务帮助事故受害者也不是他/她的义务/责任。各国政府正在试图发展新的法律来维护志愿者的利益。在像德国这样的国家，法律已经发展成为一种不是在紧急情况下帮助一个人的罪行，在加拿大，法律支持那些自愿帮助受害者的人。在这两个国家中，志愿者的权利得到维护，国家照顾受害者的任何要求。这样的行为也有可能在联合王国通过为“社会行动，责任和英雄主义”（SARAH）法案。
加拿大人权学论文代写：法案
“社会行动，责任和英雄主义法案”于2014年6月12日在联合王国下议院提出。经过批准的法案将于2015年成为法案。制定这项法案的基本原理是确保人们做当他们选择帮助某人时，不必担心被置于危险或责任之中。过去一直有人担心，人们可能会因为认为自己可能会为某件事情承担责任而放弃志愿活动或干预紧急情况。法案是对这些人的安慰，当他们为社会的利益行事，或者当他们干涉正义事业时，他们表明，鉴于他们一般负责的情况，即使有事情发生错误的，他们可能不会被基于上下文的疏忽起诉。这种保证也延伸到包括防止被起诉的法定职责。他们行动的背景和背景将得到充分考虑。
加拿大人权学论文代写：法案
The universal responsibility of any human being is to help another human in need or dire case of emergency without the person calling out for help. This Good Samaritan tendency which was prevalent among everybody has slowly started to wane off. Is it because, nowadays, people have become more materialistic? Or whether everybody is considering helping others is not needed and that it is not his / her duty / responsibility to volunteer to help an accident victim. The governments of various countries are trying to evolve new laws to safeguard the interests of the Volunteer. There are evolved laws in countries like Germany where it is an offence not to help a person in emergency, and in Canada the Law supports the person who has volunteered to help a Victim. In both these two countries, the rights of the volunteer are upheld and the state looks after any claims by the victim. Such an act is also likely to be passed in the United Kingdom as the“ Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism” (SARAH) Act.
加拿大人权学论文代写：法案
The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill were introduced in the House of Commons of the United Kingdom on June 12th, 2014. The Bill by approval will become an act in 2015. The rationale behind the development of this bill was to ensure that people do not have to worry about being put at risk or liability when they choose to help someone. There have been concerns in the past that people might put off volunteering in activities or in interventions for emergency situations because they believe they might become liable for something. The bill is a reassurance to these people, that when they are acting for the benefit of the society, or when they are intervening for a just cause and when doing so they demonstrate that given the situation they are being generally responsible then even if something went wrong they may not be sued for negligence based on context.This assurance is also extended to include protection against being sued for their statutory duties. The context and background of their actions will be given full consideration.
