不流血的军事政变在泰国发生在2006年9月19日的事件导致中止宪法的形成在1997实行戒严。这规定了由军事政府首脑承诺临时宪法，对新宪法草案的Sonthi Boonyaratglin将军。承诺是在一年内通过选举制度将权力移交给平民统治。这将发生在全民公决后，宪法获得批准。政变前将军后的几周之内，名叫Surayud Chalanont已被任命总理。此外，还设立了一个任命委员会，负责与军政府并行的裁决。宪法是临时修改了17，2007年4月。此外，关于起草宪法，有一个关于在泰国进行更广泛协商的进程（Abbott 1989）。1997起草的《宪法》是对民主政府的一个关键步骤。这是因为铲除腐败和建立良好治理的特殊规定。
The bloodless military coup taking place in Thailand on the 19th September 2006 resulted in the event of suspending of the Constitution formed in 1997 with the imposing of the martial law. This set out for a temporary constitution with a promise by the military government head, General Sonthi Boonyaratglin for a draft of a new constitution. The commitment was made of transferring power to the civilian rule with an electoral system within a year. This would happen following the referendum with an approval that the constitution had been held. Within a few weeks following the coup a former general, named Surayud Chalanont had been given the appointment of being Prime Minister. Moreover, a council of appointment has been set up for the ruling parallel to the military junta. The constitution that is provisionally revised has been drafted in 17, April 2007. Moreover, the regarding the drafting of the constitution, there is a process regarding wider consultation taking place in Thailand (Abbott 1989). The constitution drafted in 1997 has been a key step with regards to the government of democratic in nature. This is because the of the special provisions of rooting out corruption and establishing good governance.
In case of Indonesia, the fall of President Soeharto from the power in 1998 can be marked as the starting point of a new era in the constitutional history of Indonesia. In a space of four years the order of the constitution had been in place ever since the 1959 that had been totally overhauled and being the replacement of the system that supports the rule of law and democracy (Darsa 2012). The process of amendment is the marking of the political struggles and the twists and turns regarding the legal matters that does not reveal much of the constitution that eventually was implemented. In considering the extent to which the promised democracy and rule of law that has been implemented over the past five years, it is characterized by the departure from the evaluation in relation to the changes in the constitution and the political process that has been yielding them (Lim 2007). It has revealed the way the role of the law has been strengthened both institutionally and ideologically and the law constrained the power of the state.