美味的汉堡包提供了马自达C-X7汽车对抗马自达汽车刮刮卡的奖励。对于任何合同和协议的发生，都需要有意向，协议和考虑（Lambiris and Griffin 2013）。只有在提出有效要约并接受要约时，协议才能执行。在这种情况下，我们注意到该报价是由Delicious Hamburgers承诺提供的，承诺提供马自达C-X7汽车以换取刮刮卡票。另外，党也必须有一些考虑。在这种情况下，考虑的是要交换的刮刮票。因此，有意提供，并且当获得刮刮票时，双方之间有协议。
Step 2. Rules of law identified in Step 1
Delicious Hamburgers have offered to award a Mazda C-X7 car against the scratch ticket of Mazda car. For any contract and agreement to take place, there needs to be an intention, agreement and a consideration (Lambiris and Griffin 2013). An agreement is only enforceable when a valid offer is being made and the offer is accepted. In this case, it is noticed that the offer is promissory made by Delicious Hamburgers promising to offer a Mazda C-X7 car in exchange for the scratch ticket. In addition, there must also be some kind of consideration to be made by the party. In this case, the consideration is the scratch ticket which is to be exchanged. Thus, there is an intention to offer, and when the scratch ticket is being obtained, there is an agreement between the two parties.
Step 3. Applying the rule of law to the case
The offer for the Mazda car was open for everyone and to just to George or Kyle. The company had sole discretion of the time frame of the offer remaining valid, and this was clear by the statement in the advertisement saying ‘hurry, as it is only for a limited time’. The definition of this time was not mentioned at all. This time was a sole decision of the company and they could withdraw it anytime.
As for Kyle, he did not purchase any hamburgers so he was not qualified for the offer at all. George did purchase 2 hamburgers and officially won a scratch ticket with a gold car on it, but as the offer was a sole discretion of the company, by the time he reached their office, the agreement was not more valid and became null and void. Even others who had come to collect their cars did not get the reward as the first customer had reached the office and won the offer, following which the company had sole rights to close the offer.