计算机论文代写：批判性分析

计算机论文代写：批判性分析

以赛亚柏林的积极和消极自由的概念不是关于自由的类型,但它是关于培养这种自由的目的和获得有效性的目的。根据柏林,积极自由是一个由人本身,并通过自组织是指向自我实现。相反,消极的自由是所有类型的障碍,缺乏约束和障碍,这个话题,一个人或一群人,在消极意义上的自由行动。在一个理想的社会,都是必要的,积极的和消极的自由,其比例的份额在特定领域,进行帮助社会。

如果人们由外部强加的他们应该说什么,他们不应该,它不会被称为完整的自由。当人们,大多数需要说话都不允许表达他们的意见在公共福利和社会方面的重要性,抑制治理将创建越多,与它会弹回来的更强大的力量。所以消极自由是必要的,人们有言论自由的权利,他们需要传达的东西和一些进行烦人的人,能够破坏国家财产和形象。在这种情况下,人们不会有机会来判断自己的行为,在这种情况下过于消极自由是必须存在的。

计算机论文代写：批判性分析

Isaiah Berlin’s concept of positive and negative freedom is not about the type of freedom, but it is about cultivating of such freedom for a purpose and gaining validity of that purpose. According to Berlin, positive freedom is the one that is being governed by the people themselves and is directed towards self-realization through self-organization. In contrast, negative freedom is the absence of all types of obstacles, constraints, and barriers, in which the subject, a person or a group of people, has the liberty of actions in a negative sense. In an ideal society, it is necessary to have both, positive and negative freedom to its proportionate share in specific areas and conducts where it helps the society.

If people are governed externally by the imposition of what they should speak and what they should not, it is not going to be termed as complete liberty. When people, most required to speak are disallowed to voice their opinion in matters of common benefit and societal importance, the more suppression the governance will create, the more powerful it will bounce back with force. So negative freedom is necessary in which people have the right of free speech where they are required to convey something and some conducts of people which are annoying and capable of destroying national property and image. In cases, where people are not given a chance to judge their own actions, in such cases too negative freedom is required to exist.