英国中英格兰大学论文代写：新闻项目
英国中英格兰大学论文代写：新闻项目
我选择讨论的下一个媒体项目是新闻项目。美国广播公司新闻布里斯班告诉观众的世界野生动物基金会（WWF）进行的一项调查，就他们的政治任务的选择。调查导致一个记分卡的准备，这表明环境政策之间的参考大堡礁提出的各政党在最近的昆士兰选举比较（Hinchliffe，2015）。有六个参数，减少倾倒在大堡礁遗产区疏浚，停止农业污染和提高珊瑚礁的水质，保护珍贵的湿地和大堡礁沿海地区，河流的保护，布什土地，以公平的法律帮助当地社区的权利，保护鱼类、海龟和其他野生动物，最后昆士兰的平均温度降低，每一方给予百分划定的根据其敏感性和环境保护程度的绿海龟在制定政策（ABC新闻，2015）。因此，在这个新闻项目有一个非常明显的结论，关于有效的信息传播。在这个新闻报道中，可以观察到，环境作为一种政治工具，以提高认识的普通人之间的责任环境的做法，在现有的政党。手试图灌输选择各自的民主党代表根据人们对后者的建设性环境政策。因此，可以说，新闻报道实际上指出之间的差距已经制定的政策和那些需要一个干净的绿色环境。该报告激起普通人质疑现有的环境政策框架，并采取明智的决定投票给该党，可以有效地缩小差距。使平衡计分卡的视觉吸引力的收集观众的极大关注，为了加强环境的可持续性的信息，灵敏度高，对环境有绿海龟而对面有红龟和灰色地带的描述是通过一个橙色的乌龟。为了进一步解释，绿色的象征用法描绘了一个政治控制环境政策的情况，它还传达了增长和可持续性。红色的选择另一方面象征着一种风险的条件。世界自然基金会不仅统计数据，通过彩色编码龟的调查结果的代表性，使门外汉很容易理解的数据，并据此作出决定。
英国中英格兰大学论文代写：新闻项目
The next media item that I choose to discuss is a news item. ABC News Brisbane informs the viewers of a survey conducted by World Wildlife Fund (WWF) with regard to the choice of their political mandate. The survey led to the preparation of a scorecard, which showed a comparison between the environmental policies in reference to the Great Barrier Reef propounded by each political party contesting in the recent Queensland elections (Hinchliffe, 2015). There were six parameters to minimize dumping and dredging in the Great Barrier Reef heritage area, to stop farm pollution and improve the water quality of the reef, protection precious wetlands and Great Barrier Reef coastal region, protection of rivers, bush land, local community rights with the help of fair laws, conservation of fishes, turtles and other wildlife, and lastly reducing the average temperature of Queensland on which each party was given a percentage grading demarcated by a green turtle depending upon its sensitivity and degree of conservation of the environment while making policies (ABC News, 2015). Thus in this news item there is one very visible conclusion with regard to effective information dissemination. In this news report, it can be observed that environment is used as a political tool to raise awareness among common man regarding responsible environmental practices among the existing political parties. Hand in hand it tries to instil choice in people of their respective democratic representative depending upon the latter’s constructive environmental policymaking. Thus it can be said that the news report actually points out the gap between the policies already made and those that are required for a clean green environment. The report provokes common man to question the existing environmental policy framework and take an informed decision to vote for that party which can effectively bridge the gap. To make the scorecard visually appealing to gather maximum attention of the viewers and in order to strengthen the message of environmental sustainability, higher sensitivity towards the environment is shown with a green turtle while the opposite is shown with a red turtle and the depiction of the grey zones is through an orange turtle. To explain further, the symbolic usage of green depicts a situation of political control over the environmental policies and it also conveys growth and sustainability. The choice of the colour red on the other hand symbolizes a condition of risk. Not only did the WWF manage to statistically present the data, the representation of the results of the survey through colour coded turtles made it easy for a layman to comprehend the data and decide accordingly.
