In the circumstances where the supply of the product is limited, the supplier will have autonomy to control the processes. The electric company such as Duke Energy will have more dominance for the sales of the product in situations of autonomy. The companies are found to be dependent on these intrinsic factors that must be factored to be considered in the situation. For example, the company within supply chains needs to be aware of the power structure to gain comprehension (Sindi and Roe, 2017). In the event of the automotive giant Toyota, they want to expand operation in the emerging markets. Given the brand names in these systems, it is evident that they are able to gain dominance in the manufacturing and supply chain. This typically happens when the demand of the particular product is more. Another example is the development of the electric cars that are eco-friendly. It is evident that the companies such as Tesla that has gained patronage in the markets will have more power in the relationship.
It is evident that the companies in general want to be more dominant in the relationship. This is to ensure that they have leverage to handle the business transactions. Statistics have proven that in the past that companies can benefit more from dominance when compared to interdependence (Graca, Barry, and Doney, 2015). When a company has leverage in the business transactions by maintaining dominance, they can gain the best possible rate and their survival will also increase in the process. It is evident that these would depend on the external market requirement for the products that the companies make together as a whole. For some brands, there will be increase in the intangibles, and in these situations the buyer is made to pay more for the product. This can be explained as the surplus value. In this the parties are found to work with each other to add value.
Another important factor that needs to be considered is the impact of culture and subjective internal factors that dominate the relationship (Ribbink, and Grimm, 2014). These impact the final ways in which there is formulation of the final outcomes of the relationship.