论文代写价格-提高领导灵活性的发展计划。关于现有组织在战略领导能力和领导能力方面面临成功的研究可以在这里作为一个例子。可以制定一个实际的开发计划(Beck和Yeager, 2005)。首先将组织的战略敏感性与领导的敏捷性联系起来。组织的战略敏感性是指组织非常注意他们所拥有的机会的方面。他们预测机会，并根据这些机会制定计划。战略是基于现实的世界秩序，基于不同的数据解释(Right Management Group, 2017)。研究发现，组织对战略敏感的地方，他们的领导者更有洞察力。预期和远见增加，这提高了组织的弹性。可以更好地创建新选项，并且更好地改进组织通信实践。此外，当涉及到竞争环境时，组织可以不断地发展。在竞争环境中，能够适应战略敏感性的领导者很容易满足这些期望(Horney et al.， 2010)。从事战略敏感性选择的领导者可以称为敏捷领导者(Joiner and Josephs, 2006)。
Leadership has constantly been studied based on types of leadership and the ways leaders motivate their employees etc. There are leadership models and theories that have been built based on organizational issues faced by yesteryear organizations. In more current times, there has been revamping of organizations strategies to face any competitive standpoints of organizations. Leadership has been revamped to suit the purpose. To cope with the different elements of change that was arising in organizations because of human behaviour and motivation etc., leaders had to work on being more agile (Breu et al., 2002; Ahsan and Ngo-Ye, 2005). Leaders had to assess demands of organizations, the resource flexibility in organizations, the form of communication and more and take up to understanding efficient strategy implementation. In addition to the usual strategic elements, it was necessary for the leaders to work on improving culture of working, trust and relationship aspects. Where these were lacking, then the organizations were seen to fail. Given this background context, the purpose of this essay is to present the organizational leadership case study of Yahoo, as led by CEO Marissa Mayer.
Organizational Leadership Case Study
The research studies on existing organizations who are facing success when it comes to strategic leadership capabilities and leadership abilities can be taken as an example here. A practical development plan can be developed (Beck and Yeager, 2005). Now firstly strategic sensitivity of the organization and leadership agility are connected. Strategic sensitivity of an organization is the aspects of organization where the organization is very mindful of the opportunities that they have. They anticipate opportunities and are seen to plan based on these opportunities. Strategies are planned on realistic world order and based on the different interpretation of data (Right Management Group, 2017). Studies identified that where organizations are strategic sensitive, then their leaders are more insightful. Anticipation and foresight increases and this improves organizational resilience. New options can be created better, and the organizational communication practices are improved better as well. In addition, it is identified that the organization can continuous evolve when it comes to competitive landscapes. These expectations in competitive landscapes are easily met by the leader who can adapt strategic sensitivity (Horney et al., 2010). The leader who works on strategic sensitivity options can be called an agile leader (Joiner and Josephs, 2006).
Secondly, to increase leadership agility, it is necessary to improve resource fluidity and communication. This part of the development plan is needed to ensure that the organization in question adopts strategic options with more flexible standpoint (Swisher, 2013; Crocitto and Youssef, 2003). An organization that is seen to be suffering issues already would not be able to flexible enough in choosing solutions if the organization is very much contained in its choices (Pixton et al., 2010). Resources must be given the needed autonomy and should not be encouraged by the leaders all the time to just follow a rulebook. If necessary, the leaders must encourage the employees to work with a we-win approach, where the employees would believe they are part of the organizational success. Communicating hence becomes a critical element here, as the combined sense of actions of the resources will be needed for maintaining strategic advantage (McKenzie and Aitken, 2012). Therefore, in the organization, resources would have to be given better fluidity and better communication protocols should have been present.