论文代写：惩罚罪犯

论文代写：惩罚罪犯

挑战和在某种程度上得罪集体良心的人是罪犯。他们的行为是对社会规范的行为。Durkheim也同意，不能有社会无犯罪，因为那将是一个不健康的社会是一个刚性。这是缺乏安全感的社会，使罪犯使社会的健康成员击退。一般社会的道德情感是被冒犯的。罪犯被看作是一种威胁。涂尔干认为，弱社会的社会整合，更将必然的惩罚的威胁也很严重。然而，这会导致质疑的犯罪是一个威胁，而不论社会秩序？社会秩序和集体的良心，必须决定的处罚的严重程度，只有基于威胁水平？
对涂尔干理论的优点是，它强化了一个广阔的建构和解读的惩罚（史葛&弗林，2014）。刑罚在社会是一种无功的谴责，这是容易理解的使用涂尔干。关系的社会类型和处罚，给予是一种进步的思想，确实是有助于理解为什么惩罚改变这些年来。原始社会不同的惩罚罪犯和封建社会或机械社会将社会团结是基于相似性和更多的威胁，团结，更严重的惩罚。在过去的罪犯被石头或绞死（亚力山大& Smith，2005）。现在他们的惩罚是不太严重，社会认为，罪犯仍然有机会恢复正常生活后。刑罚社会学是分析和解释刑事制度的行为的一个框架，是一个有帮助的框架。关于惩罚的最社会学的观点，在一个非常复杂的注释。涂尔干的角度，然而在集体意识的观点。

论文代写：惩罚罪犯

People who challenge and in some way offend the collective conscience are the criminals. They are the deviants acting against the norms of society. Durkheim also agrees that there cannot be a society without crime because then it would be an unhealthy society-one that is rigid. It is the insecurities in society that causes criminals who make the healthy members of society repulse. The moral emotions of the society in general are offended. The offender is seen as a threat. Durkheim argues that the weaker the social integration of the society, the stronger will be the threat and consequentially the punishment will also be severe. This however leads to the questioning of can a crime be a threat irrespective of the social order? Do the social order and the collective conscience have to necessarily dictate the severity of the punishment only based on the threat level?
Some of the strengths of the Durkheim theory are that it reinforces a wider construction and interpretation of punishment (Scott, & Flynn, 2014). Punishments in society are a form of reactive condemnation and this is easily understood using Durkheim. The connection between the type of society and the punishment that is meted out is a progressive thought that is indeed helpful to understand why punishments have changed through the years. A primitive society will differ in the punishments it metes out and a feudal society or a mechanical society will Social solidarity is based on similarity and the more the threat against that solidarity, the more sever the punishment. In the past criminals were stones or hanged (Alexander, & Smith, 2005). Now they the punishments are less severe and society believes that the criminal will still have a chance to lead a normal life after restitution. The sociology of punishment is a framework which is helpful when analyzing and interpreting the actions of penal institutions. Most sociological perspectives with respect to punishments, view them in a very complex note. The Durkheimian perspective however views them in a collective sense.