留学 论文代写：康德义务论

留学 论文代写：康德义务论

康德义务论是另一种伦理学理论，它的基础是，如果一个人的行为被认为是合乎道德的，那么这个人的行为就被认为是合乎道德的(Tabb, 2004)。在这里，它表明规则支配着行为，如果一个人完全按照规则行事，并且不管出于什么原因避免任何偏差，那么这个行为就被认为是道德的，而实施这个行为的人就是一个道德的存在。考虑到义务论在大众汽车案例中的应用，我们可以看到，如果安装失败设备的行为属于公司的规则，那么这种行为就是道德行为。

留学 论文代写：康德义务论
然而,这里有严重矛盾时试图识别规则的起源和规则是真正相关的在这种情况下,道德的普遍性规律、规则与大众的好处,规则局限于人类的好处,或规则局限于公司的客户带来的好处。因为康德基于他对普遍道德规则的依赖;安装一个失败装置的行为被认为是不道德的，因为它产生于一种乐于看到别人遭受健康问题的意志。此外，该公司并不担心这种装置对污染和随之而来的人们健康问题的后果，只把自己的利益作为法案的基础。

留学 论文代写：康德义务论

Kantian Deontology is another ethical theory which is based on the foundation that any action of man is considered to be moral if the man is said to have enacted exactly as he was required by being aligned to the rules of action (Tabb, 2004). Here it indicates that rules dominate action and if one acts exactly as per the rules and avoids any deviation for whatsoever reason, then that act is said to be moral and the person enacting the act to be a moral being. Considering the application of deontology in the case of Volkswagen, it is seen that if the act of installing a defeat device is within the rule of the company, then the act is considered to be moral.

留学 论文代写：康德义务论
However, there is severe contradiction here when there is an attempt to identify the origin of the rule and what rules are really relevant in this case, be it the universal rule of morality, rules associated with benefits of Volkswagen, rules confined to the benefits of mankind, or rules confined to the benefits of the company’s customers. Since Kant basis his dependence on the rule of a universal morality; the action of installing a defeat device is considered to be immoral because it is arising from a will that takes pleasure in seeing other people suffer from bad health. Additionally, the company does not bother about the consequences of such a device on pollution and subsequent health issues of people, and only considers its own benefit as the basis of the act.