加拿大生理学论文代写:移民的权利
加拿大生理学论文代写:移民的权利
关于“第十四修正案自由法”，有人指出，国家无权干涉个人对生活，教育，教养，宗教和行动的选择，而且国家也不会侵犯与个人进行干预的权利以保护公共利益或国家安全为名的自由，只要个人的活动不危害个人或国家的安全。因此，可以确定，个人的生命权和自由权在宪法上得到保障，公民的行使自由的权利在美国的所有社会和文化边界得以实现。还应该指出的是，对社会边缘化群体和移民的权利有保障。
加拿大生理学论文代写:移民的权利
然而，值得注意的是，自由观念受到1930年代政治士气的强烈影响。在这方面，考虑美国总统富兰克林·德拉诺·罗斯福的意见将是非常有见地的。他认为，自由这个词必须从政治自由的角度来看待，这意味着从强权的魔掌中释放出来;政府在他的新政中。他使用’新交易’导致成立了几个政府机构。事实上，他强调自由的观念具有更激情的表达，并声称这种自由的新观念意味着更多的企业家和投资者获得经济机会和权力的能力。在这方面，必须指出的是，这个罗斯福的观点受到胡佛的批评，胡佛“指责他的继任者危害到美国的根本自由”（胡佛，1936）。胡佛还补充说，罗斯福“或者是纯粹的机会主义，没有政策的连贯目的，或者正在密谋将欧洲思想强加于美国”（胡佛，1936）。
加拿大生理学论文代写:移民的权利
With regard to the Fourteenth Amendment law of liberty, it was noted that the state did not have the right to interfere with the individual choice of life, education, upbringing, religion and movement and the state will not violate the right to intervening with the individual freedom in the name of protecting public interest or the state safety, so long as the individual activity does not jeopardize the individual or national security. Therefore, it could be ascertained that the individual right to life and liberty was constitutionally guaranteed and the citizens’ right to exercise their liberty were realized across all social and the cultural borders of America. It is also to be noted that the rights guaranteed protection to the marginalized sections of the society and the immigrants.
加拿大生理学论文代写:移民的权利
However, it is to be noted that the idea of liberty was strongly influenced by the political morale’s in the 1930s. In this regard, it would be insightful to consider the opinion of the US President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He believed that the word liberty must be perceived from the point of the political freedom, such that it would signify the release from the clutches of a powerful; government in his New Deal. His employment of the ‘New Deals’ led to the establishment of several governmental agencies. In fact, he emphasized upon the idea of liberty with greater passionate expression and claimed that this new idea of liberty implied a greater capability for economic opportunity and power for the entrepreneurs and the investors. In this regard, it must be noted that this idea of Roosevelt was greatly criticized by Hoover who “accused his successor of endangering the fundamental American liberties” (Hoover, 1936). Hoover also added that the Roosevelt was “either operating out of sheer opportunism, with no coherent purpose of policy or was conspiring to impose the European ideas on the United States” (Hoover, 1936).
