加拿大论文代写-香港环境法之司法审查的依据是什么

加拿大论文代写-香港环境法之司法审查的依据是什么？司法覆核的根据，是两名香港市民所提出的申索，他们指称赤鱲角机场在签发第三跑道许可证时，政府没有采取正确的预防措施。他们申请司法审查，并向法院提起诉讼，要求停止环境保护部门的决定。他们说，这是一个庞大的基础设施，这种基础设施所引起的环境问题具有重大的公众重要性。

Their basis for filing for a judicial review was based on four grounds. The first ground of challenge that they state is (1) Ground 1/AL21. They believe that the Director of the Environmental Protection Department had approved the project based on an undetermined assumption. The undetermined assumption that the immediate airspace of the Pearl River Delta will be was available for air traffic movement projections and assessment. The plaintiffs alleged that the EIA report did not consider needed offsite compensation measurement.
The second is Ground 2/AL21. Here the two Hong Kong citizens make the following two points. Firstly, they state that when the EIA assessment and reporting was done, they did not show due compliance to study briefs as was required to understand environmental impact. They alleged that ecological impact assessment in the context of the Chinese white dolphins needed further assessment. This re-review was required because the EIA had not provided for the adequate compensation measure that will be required to counteract destruction at the time of the construction of project. Secondly, the two citizens alleged that the EIA had not considered the ecological impact as a cumulative effect. There were some projects that had been proposed or were committed or were going through development already. The Hong Kong Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Project and the Lung Kwu Tan Project are two of them. Given that such projects were already underway, it was not enough if an individual assessment was done by the Environmental Protection Department with respect to this project alone. Ho contended that a cumulative impact assessment should have been conducted by the Environmental Protection Department and that this had not been done. Secondly, Ho stated that in proposing measures to counteract the environmental impact, stakeholders had to be consulted. The allegations here was that a fair public consultation was missing at this point and so the public could not give their opinions when it came to the loss of habitat impact on Chinese White Dolphins.
By Ground 3/AL21, Ho alleged that the director had acted in an illegal and irrational manner when they signed off the permit for the project and finally Ground 4/AL21 was that the director in making an important decision that would affect many had failed to provide the right reasons for such decision making.
Based on these different rounds, the duo argued that there was much doubt on what form of reasoning went into the decision making. Since this was not known, Ho Loy wanted an interim injunction to be passed that would stop the construction project until the court decided on arranging for a second judicial review. It was furthermore adulated that having a judicial review could also serve as an amendment in the context of further future infrastructural projects.

中国留学生英语论文不会写，可以找加拿大论文代写Advanced Thesis平台机构，加拿大论文代写Advanced Thesis平台机构有认真负责的写手老师，可以解决中国留学生的论文写作难题，保证论文原创，为留学生提供硕士论文代写、report代写、essay代写、assignment代写等论文服务，并使用权威的抄袭检测系统，让留学生们轻松应对论文写作并创作出专属个人的优秀论文！加拿大论文代写Advanced Thesis网站平台分享的所有论文范文，未经转载，不得私自转发或专用，如有发现，我们网站平台将会追责一切法律责任，望留学生们谅解！