从功能角度,这个幽灵的理解可持续发展需要转换视角时,我们处理的自然资源。至少,它要求控制在我们的消费行为。这种本质点的前提是人类的放纵的,可持续发展的实现需要完全与环境的可持续性平衡;因为这个原因自然供应原材料在满足人类需求(汉森，R. S . 1992)。为此,然而,企业社会责任问题,公平分配问题相关的来源,也需要参加,不利于可持续发展的原则的理解。
SD determines that economic growth can damage the atmosphere but authors argue that it doesn’t have to. This new formula of ‘sustainability’ still upsets many conservationists, like Mohamed Idris:
The phrase ‘sustainable’ from the environmental perspective indicates the continuation of the integrity of the ecology. It signifies a balanced relationship in between humanity and the environment, that is, harmony in the communication between people and their interaction among dwindling natural resources. ‘The term ‘sustainable’ from the perspective of non-ecological influential indicates ‘how to continue to preserve the supply of natural resources when the existing resources run out’.
In functional terms, the understanding of this apparition of sustainable advancement needs transformations in our perspectives when it comes to our handling of the natural resources. At least, it calls for control in our consumption practices. This essential point is premised on the indulgent that sustainable implementation of human beings requires is entirely bound up with sustainability of environmental balance; for this reason the nature supplies the raw material context within which human requirements are fulfilled (Hansen, R. S. 1992). To this end, nevertheless, Corporate Social Responsibility concerns like fair distribution of sources and also associated issues need to be attended so that they militate against the understanding of the principle of sustainable development.