加拿大论文代写：外国公司治理措施
加拿大论文代写：外国公司治理措施
此外，中国证券监督管理委员会（中国证监会）（Cornforth，2011）成立了一个新的政府机构。这是为了管理一个新的股票市场而创造的。
中国通过的第一部“公司法”，已经看到了企业现代化结构的发展和崛起。这部法律为公司的权利和责任的划定做出了贡献。对于中国股市投资的事实，在这段时间内有了明显的观察。不管这些改革如何，国家的股东似乎都享有压倒性的偏好，而不是个人或个人投资者。在2006年，第一套新政策的实施由中国（Brennan，2010）完成。这些政策的内涵是能够解决个人和国家股东之间权力持续不平衡的问题。
加拿大论文代写：外国公司治理措施
直到最近，中华民国的公司治理才有所不同。这主要是由于该国的经济结构。特别是大型企业是国家所有，这意味着企业的管理者既要对企业事务负责，又要对国家政策的目标负责。
过去三十年来，中国经济改革发展迅速。在同样的时间内，中国为创造外国公司治理和外交监督机制而制定了政策。这是为了提高公众对中外市场的信心。无论如何，中国公司治理机制一直不好。通过分析所提供的两篇文章，中国面临着一些障碍。这些障碍包括资本市场不成熟，控制财务虚假披露机制薄弱，内幕交易猖獗，董事会独立性低，国家所有权集中度高等。
加拿大论文代写：外国公司治理措施
Adoption of Foreign Corporate Governance Practices
Also, a new body of government was created, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) (Cornforth 2011). This was created for the regulation of a new stock market.
The next ten years had been seeing the development and emergence of a modern structure for enterprises, as the first Company Law was passed by China. This law contributed in the delineation of rights and responsibilities for corporations. There was a clear observation on the facts regarding the investments being made in the stock markets of China, surging in this duration of time. Irrespective of these reforms, shareholders of the state seemed to enjoy the overwhelming favouritism instead of individual or personal investors. In the year 2006, implementation of the first set of new policies was done by China (Brennan 2010). The intension of these policies was to be able to address the continuing imbalance in power amongst individual and state shareholders.
加拿大论文代写：外国公司治理措施
Until recent times, corporate governance had been seen to be different within individuals of Republic of China. This was mostly due to the economic structure of the country. Particularly, large scale corporation were owned by the state that meant that managers of the firm were accountable and responsible towards both, business matters as well as goals of the state policy.
There has been a rapid growth in the economic reforms of China since the previous three decades. In the same duration of time, development of policies has been done by China for creation of Foreign Corporate Governance and mechanisms of foreign-style oversight. This has been done in an attempt for improving confidence of public within the markets in China and Abroad. Irrespective of this progress, mechanisms of corporate governance within China have stayed weak. China has faced a number of obstacles that have been identified by analysing the two articles provided. These obstacles include immature markets of capital, weak mechanisms for controlling false disclosure of finance, rampant trading by insider, low level of independence amongst the Boards of Directors, and immense concentration on ownership of state.
