加拿大论文代写：企业网络管理

加拿大论文代写：企业网络管理

有网络协调包括增强学习在组织中具有相当的优势，有效利用资源，增加的容量规划和解决复杂问题，增强竞争力，即兴基于客户端的服务。因此，阿格拉诺夫和麦奎尔2001，这个观点已经被强调“现在是治理的一个核心研究的任务，网络管理必须放在前面，如在公共管理领域的重要场所的检查。拥抱这些作者的观点，我们认为，管理层的作用是有效的网络结果的关键（klijin等人，2010A）。具体来说，我们研究管理的努力，在一个相互依存的设置工作支持计划，吸引合作伙伴的努力，克服了其他演员的挑战。分析了网络管理对网络的结果采用定义网络的三个或更多的合法的自治组织，共同实现不仅是他们自己的目标，也是一个集体的目标群体的影响，针对这些网络开发政策转化为行动（通过等人，2010b）。这些网络的建立与一个特定的目的，通过那些参与网络或通过授权，和进化主要是通过有意识的努力加强协调。
通过等人。（2010b）回忆，“基本参数通常是没有足够的网络管理策略，它是非常困难的，甚至是不可能的，在这些复杂的网络实现有趣的结果。假设没有网络管理的一个令人满意的结果，往往是不可能的。然而，在网络管理的文献仍有更多的理论问题比实际的实证研究（lenferink et al，2013）。因此，研究需要能够测量网络的结果和性能（李晓华，2013）。此外，根据网络文学；我们还研究了网络中的信任。然而，这些研究刚刚开始被应用于公共管理。例如，通过等人。（2010b）提供网络的实证研究与网络之间的合作伙伴的信任水平，结果被那些网络实现。根据这些作者，合作伙伴间的信任和网络的结果之间存在一定的正相关关系。

加拿大论文代写：企业网络管理

There are considerable advantages of network coordination inclusive of enhanced learning in the organization, efficiently using resourced, increased capacity for planning and addressing complicated issues with enhanced competitiveness and improvised client based services. Accordingly, Agranoff and McGuire 2001, on this view has been examined by emphasizing that ‘as it is now a core task of governance, network management must be placed up front as an essential arena of examination in the fields of public management and administration’. Embracing the view of these authors, we argue that the role of management is critical for effective network outcomes (Klijin et al, 2010a). Specifically, we examine management efforts to work in an interdependent setting to build support for programme, attract partners in cooperative endeavours, and overcome the challenges presented by other actors. To analyse the impact of network management on network outcomes we adopt definition of networks as ‘groups of three or more legally autonomous organizations that work together to achieve not only their own goals but also a collective goal’, focusing on those networks that develop policies and convert them into action (Klijn et al, 2010b). These networks are set up with a specific purpose, either by those who participate in the network or through mandate, and evolve largely through conscious efforts to enhance coordination.
Klijn et al. (2010b) recall that ‘the basic argument is usually that without adequate network management strategies, it is very difficult, or even impossible, to achieve interesting outcomes in these complex networks’. The assumption is that a satisfactory outcome is often impossible without network management. However, in the network management literature there are still more theoretical questions than actual empirical research (Lenferink et al, 2013). Therefore, studies are needed to be able to measure network outcomes and performance (Considine, 2013).Moreover, in accordance with the network literature; we also examine trust in the network. However, this stream of research has just started to be applied to public administration. For instance, Klijn et al. (2010b) provide an empirical study of networks and relate the levels of trust between network partners to the outcomes achieved by those networks. According to these authors, there is a positive relationship between trust among partners and network outcomes.