report代写

加拿大论文代写

加拿大论文代写

Ever since the argument over CSR began, detractors and supporters have been arguments for the opinion of CSR and the arguments against the definition of CSR. The case against the definition of CSR typically begins with the classical economic argument by the late Milton Friedman (1962). Friedman indicates that management has one responsibility which is maximize the profits of its shareholders and owners. Friedman states that social issue are not the concern for business people and these kind of problem should solved by the free market system and unfettered workings. If free market system cannot solve this kind of problems, it falls not upon companies, but upon government and legislation to do a job. Another objection to corporate social responsibility has been that companies are not equipped to handle social activities. This position holds that managers are consistent towards operation and finance and do not have social skills to make social oriented decision (Davis, 1973). A third objection is that companies already have enough power, and it is impossible for the companies place in its hands the chance to use additional power, like social power (Davis, 1973). A fourth argument against CSR is it reduces company’s primary purpose (Hayek, 1969). A fifth argument, by pursuing corporate social responsibility, companies should make itself less competitive globally. The most influential critic is Noble Prize winner Milton Friedman, who claims that CSR is squander of stockholder’s money. While, a lot of article claims an opposite opinion about CSR that it can be increase a company’s financial performance in the long-term run. The EU believe that CSR also can promote regions and even the country’s reputation, in Europe, there are many countries are committed to promoting enterprise to set up with the enterprise culture of CSR, make the region more attractive to investors, the area of the market products have more positive brand image.

加拿大论文代写

从企业社会责任的争论开始,反对者和支持者已经对企业社会责任的观点,对企业社会责任的定义的引数。对企业社会责任的定义的情况下通常始于由已故密尔顿弗里德曼经典经济参数(1962)。弗里德曼指出,管理有一个责任,最大限度地提高其股东的利润和所有者。弗里德曼指出,社会问题并不关心商业人士,这类问题应该解决的自由市场制度和自由的工作。如果自由市场机制无法解决这类问题,它不会在公司,但在政府和立法来做一份工作。另一个反对企业社会责任是企业不具备处理社会活动。这个位置是一致认为,管理者对经营和财务,没有社会技能使社会导向决策(戴维斯,1973)。三分之一的反对意见是,公司已经拥有足够的力量,这是不可能的公司在其手中的机会使用额外的电源的地方,如社会力量(戴维斯,1973)。四分之一反对企业社会责任是降低了公司的主要目的(哈耶克,1969)。五分之一个参数,通过追求企业的社会责任,企业应该使自己不在全球的竞争力。最有影响力的评论家是诺贝尔奖的获得者密尔顿弗里德曼,谁声称,企业社会责任是股东的钱挥霍。同时,很多提出相反的意见,对企业社会责任,可以提高长期运行公司的财务表现。欧盟认为CSR也可以促进地区乃至国家的声誉,在欧洲,有许多国家致力于促进企业建立企业社会责任的企业文化,使该地区对投资者更具吸引力,市场产品的地区有更积极的品牌形象。