代写report推荐

加拿大代写论文:价值观分歧

加拿大代写论文:价值观分歧

因此,价值可以说是真实的,因为它们能够在一个继续经历多样性的社区内传达我们的人性水平,这个多样性反过来受到自身多样性的影响。因此,阿皮亚认为价值观并不是真实的,因为我们现在所处的世界只是我们的需要和欲望的结果。随着时间的推移,其中一些欲望和愿望发生了变化,而另一些则保持不变,这是由于这种变化价值观在当今如此全球化的社区中演变。因此,考虑这些价值是否值得被“如此全球化”(Skold 5-23)社区所接受,可能更为合理。无论如何,Appiah用对话作为探讨这些差异的工具的观点是有效的,应该接受文化冲突引起的任何冲突,以便理解我们的全球社区。

除此之外,Appiah在他的书中解释了“意见分歧”的意思。使用世界性的观点,预期在文化内部和文化间会产生分歧。他在文化解释上的差异和对​​词汇和价值条款的重视,对分歧的发生负责。考虑到上面的情况,对于在餐厅外面是否有孩子留下来是否可以(Skold 5-23)存在分歧。根据阿皮亚的说法,家庭可以选择养育自己想要的孩子,只有当社会提出的方法“有效”和“有意义”时,任何分歧都应该被视为一个问题。换言之,阿皮亚强调的是认为如果两个分歧的人不是不同意彼此的信念,而是争论他们对这些原则的重视,而这种价值的重要性取决于它所源自的文化(Skold 5-23)。

加拿大代写论文:价值观分歧

Thus, values can be said to be real in the sense that they are capable of communicating our level of humanity within a community that continues to experience diversity which in turn is influenced by its own diversity. Hence, Appiah argues that values are not real since there are simply a result of our wants and desires for the world we currently live in. With time, some of these wants and desires change while others remain the same and it is due to this change that values evolve in community that is now so global. Therefore, it may be more logical to consider whether if these values are worthy of being accepted by the “oh so global” (Skold 5-23)community. Either way, Appiah’s notion of using conversation as a tool to explore these differences is effective and that any conflicts resulting from cultural clashes should be accepted so as to understand our global community.

Along with the above, Appiah explains what “having a difference in opinion” means, in his book. Using a cosmopolitan view, disagreements are expected within and across cultures. He holds the difference in cultural interpretation and the weight put on vocabulary and terms of value, responsible for the occurrence of disagreements. Considering the given situation above, there was a disagreement on whether if it is alright to leave a child attended outside a restaurant or not(Skold 5-23). According to Appiah, families can choose to nurture their children using which ever means they want to and any disagreement should be considered an issue only if the society’s proposed method “works” and “makes sense.” In other words, Appiah is emphasizes on the idea that if two people in an disagreement are not disagreeing with each other’s belief but are arguing over weight of value that they place over those principles and this weight of values is dependent on the culture it is derived from(Skold 5-23).