The conventional definition of relation in industries is given by that systematic perspective which incorporates the rule study and the variation that is present with time. In more simpler words, however, it can be said that it is a study of employment relationship regulation that is present between employees and employers at a collective level and an individual level. From this perspective, an employment relation determines the substantive issues and the issues of procedures in industries, organizations and levels of work places. This relationship is a relationship of exchange where the feature that distinguishes both variables involved lies in the relations of market and the relations of management. The exchange is based on several factors such as future prospects involving to learn and to socialize, indeterminate being contradicting in nature, exploitation in the past, not being determined and consistent. Even though the employment relations study holds its focus over work regulation, it also takes consideration of the influences that economy and society have over capital relative power and the employers interactions with the organization collectively. The branch of study within employment relations that deals with description and systematic analysis of employment relations between any two or more countries is known as comparative employment relations.
From this perspective and the importance of comparative employment relations evident from the definition itself, this essay has been created. The purpose of this paper mainly is to focus on whether or not comparative employment relations research is a defensible aspiration but ultimately an impossible achievement? This statement has been discussed in the paper with relevance to advantages and issues that comparative employment relations research may have. In order to do so, comparative employment relations research examples have been discussed especially for illustrating the main focus arguments in this essay.