加拿大代写essay：感情自主性
加拿大代写essay：感情自主性
第四类是情感自主性，即个体被理解为促进个体与他人相关的情感积极体验。例如，一个人的行为也会给周围的人带来积极的感觉。能力是一个范畴，在这个范畴中，环境的主导地位被认为是个人野心、成功或冒险的首要价值。和谐是一种文化影响再次被视为个体与社会或环境的结合。施瓦茨再次挑战个人主义和集体主义的维度。例如，一个人可以表现出更多的个人主义特征，但仍然担心他们与自然的和谐。最后一类是平等主义妥协。在相互关心彼此福祉的社会中，可以说存在着一种平等的妥协。智力和情感的自主在这里将发挥积极的作用。Hofstede文化的优势在于，它依赖于由来已久的个人主义集体主义二分法来呈现不同的类别。
加拿大代写essay：感情自主性
因此，它为学习文化学科的人们理解Hofstede维度提供了一个简单的过渡。Hofstede进一步提出了一个非常普遍的框架来理解文化维度如何在国家之间存在，以及如何从文化差异的角度来理解文化，而不仅仅是作为一种单独的文化。为此，Hofstede成功地将文化概括为软件。因此，推动文化发展的是跨文化个体对价值观的理解。在区分Hofstede的维度时所使用的评分方法，在研究或管理应用中，可以用于理解不同国家的文化。然而，该理论也有其不足之处，巴斯克维尔(2003)认为Hofstede试图将许多文化信仰和规范定义为价值观，从而缩小了文化定义的范围。
加拿大代写essay：感情自主性
The fourth category is that of affective autonomy where the individual is understood in the context of promoting affective positive experience for the individual as related to others. So for instance, an individual would act in ways that would create a positive feel for the people around them too. Competency is a category where the dominance of the surroundings is considered with values assigned as priorities in the making of individual ambition or success or risk. Harmony is a category where the cultural impact is viewed once again as a combination of the indivudal and the society or environment. Once again Schwartz challenges the individualistic and collectivistic dimension. So for instance, an individual could exhibit more individualistic traits and still worry about how harmonious they are with nature. The final category is that of the Egalitarian compromise. In societies, where there is a mutual concern with regards to the well-being of one another, it can be said that there is an egalitarian compromise. Intellectual and affective autonomy will play a positive role here. The strengths of the Hofstede culture are that it has relied on the time honored approach of individualistic collectivistic dichotomy to present different categories.
加拿大代写essay：感情自主性
Hence, it provides an easy transition for people studying cultural discipline to understand the Hofstede dimensions. Hofstede furthermore has presented a very universal framework to understand how cultural dimensions might exist across countries and how culture could be understood better in terms of cultural differences more than just as an individual culture. To this end, Hofstede has managed to summarize culture like software. The understanding of values across individuals of a culture is what hence drives the culture. The score approach that has been used in the case of differentiating Hofstede’s dimensions are useful for applying them in understanding different country’s cultures in the case of research studies or for management uses. There are however weaknesses to the theory, Baskerville (2003) argue that Hofstede in attempting to define many cultural beliefs and norms as values, has narrowed the cultural definitions.
