滑铁卢论文代写：枪支管制:美国和中国
滑铁卢论文代写：枪支管制:美国和中国
2013年8月28日,比尔•克林顿发表了一份声明称点燃燃烧问题的优先级。“一个伟大的民主并不很难投票比购买武器的攻击”(克林顿,2013年)。买一个突击步枪在美国不需要任何身份证明在40多个州而投票一个需要id证据无处不在。在美国这就是讽刺的法律。
美国宪法第二修正案下允许公民持枪的权利。枪政治一直是美国政治的一个有争议的问题。在美国,更容易获得枪支比一些常见的设施(凯斯勒,1983)。
考虑堕胎吗?在密苏里州,它比流产更容易得到一把枪。在爱荷华州,枪支出售速度比柠檬水。在德克萨斯州,获得驾照需要更多的训练比得到一把枪。这就是这里的法律的悖论。这些自由法律导致枪支数量的增加相关的暴力在美国。这清楚地解释了事件像宾厄姆顿枪击事件,胡德堡枪击案、弗吉尼亚理工大学惨案,Oikos大学拍摄,和2011年图森射击。
滑铁卢论文代写：枪支管制:美国和中国
On August 28, 2013, Bill Clinton made a statement that ignited a burning question on priorities. “A great democracy does not make it harder to vote than to buy an assault weapon” (Clinton, 2013). Buying an assault rifle in the United States does not require any identification proof in more than 40 states whereas for voting one requires id proof everywhere. Such is the irony of the laws in the United States.
The United States Constitution under its Second Amendment allows its citizens the right to bear arms. Gun politics has always been a controversial issue in American politics. In America, it is easier to get a gun than some of the common amenities (Kessler, 1983).
Thinking of an abortion? In Missouri, it is easier to get a gun than an abortion. In Iowa, guns sell faster than lemonade. In Texas, getting a driver’s license requires more training than getting a gun. Such is the paradox of the laws prevailing here. These liberal laws have led to increased number of gun related violence across the United States. This clearly explains incidents like Binghamton shootings, Fort Hood shooting, the Virginia Tech massacre, Oikos University shooting, and 2011 Tucson shooting.
