代做assignment：电影与历史记载的区别

代做assignment：电影与历史记载的区别

然而，阅读历史和所有与之相关的微小事件，以及以一种简洁的方式在视频上观看历史，是有区别的。内战的主要事件都被很好地记录下来了。在电影中出现的几乎每一个事件中，都有一个字幕来帮助观众理解时间、人物和事件。电影中大部分的焦点都集中在会议上，因为这些会议是历史创造中一些更重要的事件。历史事件是人类创造的;伟大的领袖领导并支持这项运动。电影中的领导人毛泽东由唐国强饰演，另一个主要人物是国民党的蒋介石，由张国立饰演。在早期的会议中，两位领导人都以一种观众毫不怀疑的方式展现出来，他们都同样强大。他们都是孙中山的信徒，孙中山建立了中国的第一个共和国。读历史书时，人们往往会读到更多关于领导人民革命的领导人以及目前存在着行政基础的领导人的资料。
读这本书的人很有可能无法真正理解是谁领导了反对派，他们的理想是什么，或者在这种情况下，这个人和这个政党有多腐败，即使这个人本身被描绘成一个性格坚强的人。国民党一直以公正的方式代表，目前的媒体报道暗示这部电影可能会在2016年上映。但是，在看电影的同时，也在看《每日电讯报》上的一些电影评论时，可以看出，在当今时代，一些电影对白可能是国民党难以接受的。电影中国民党被自己的事业打败了。这在历史文学中也是一种表现。关于这一主题的文献研究表明，国民党对这一主题的研究表明，在共产党成立并领导国家的革命转型时，中国是一个破败不堪的国家(邹，1999)。当时国民党内部存在着帝国主义分子，帝国主义意识形态在统治中占主导地位。

代做assignment：电影与历史记载的区别

However, there is a difference in reading history and all the minute events that contributed to it, and watching history in a concise manner on video. The main events of the civil war have been captured very well. In almost every event that is presented in the movie, it has a captioning to help the audience understand the time, the character and the event. Most of the focus in the movie have been on meetings, as these meetings were some of the more important events in the creation of history. The historical events were created by men; great leaders led and supported the movement. The leader Mao Zedong was represented in the movie by Tang Guoqiang and the other main character was Chiang Kai-shek of the KMT who is portrayed by Zhang Guoli. In the early meeting, both leaders are represented in a way that the viewer is left in no doubt that both were just as powerful. They are both the disciples of the person who set up the country’s first republic, Sun Yat-sen. In reading a history book, one tends to read more on the leader who led the civil revolution and the one whose foundation of administration is currently existent.
There are chances that the person reading it might not get the actual understanding on who led the opposition, what their ideals were, or in this case how corrupted the person and party was, even though the person themselves was represented as a strong personality. The KMT has been represented in a fair way and the current media reports suggest that this movie might get released in 2016. However, when watching the movie and also reading some of the movie commentary on the Telegraph, it can be seen that some movie dialogues might be difficult for the KMT to accept in present times. KMT is shown in the movie as having suffered defeat by its own undertakings. This is indeed a representation in historical literature, too. Literature research on the subject shows that the KMT Research studies on the subject shows that China was a dilapidated state when the Communist party was created and led the revolutionary transformation of the state (Tsou, 1999). It was a time when the imperialist elements existed in the KMT and the imperialist ideology was much more dominant in the ruling.