风险管理显然是几乎所有组织的一项关键业务，因为通过对风险的管理和合理的风险配置文件创建，可以提供股东回报。行业对声誉风险和财务性质的风险更加关注。声誉在财务影响的情况下可以导致一个组织的生产力的直接影响(David Gonski, 2014)。尽管必和必拓一直在监控声誉风险的雷达，但就最近的滞纳金而言，它面临着几个问题。此外，在澳大利亚，通过必和必拓首席执行官，不断变化的社会环境和企业基础上的再开发是必要的。当业务增长时，他们的责任也随之增长，这就需要进行风险管理，而不是承担所有的风险。必和必拓的融资决策环境和社会影响可以通过特定的设计和声誉风险雷达进行监测。由于必和必拓有能源和矿产方面的规定，但在报告可持续性方面，它仍有明确的优先事项，报告的内容大多集中在环境和能源可持续性目标上。
能源供应商关注的是客户，并推动客户做出可再生能源的改变。此外，该公司有能力作出直接的可持续性变化，其中，该公司的变化具有间接性，通过使用能源和材料负载的政策。这样一个行业正在快速变化，现有的能源资源减少，这些公司面临着巨大的压力，需要在整个环境中做正确的事情(Dunphy et al .， 2007)。另一方面，快餐行业从麦当劳的角度来看一直在以动态的速度变化。当读到这样的报告时，很明显，必和必拓有更多的能源是通过环境、经济和可持续发展来驱动的，而麦当劳则是通过客户来推动基于可持续发展的发展。这可能是因为必和必拓所处的行业燃料已开始减少，公众和媒体眼中的全球变暖引发了一个巨大的问题。
Risk management is evident as a key business of mostly all organizations as through management of risk and reasonable risk profile creation leads towards providing shareholder returns. The industry has more concern over the risk in reputation along with the risks of financial nature. Reputation as in the financial implications situation can lead towards a direct influence over productivity of an organization (David Gonski, 2014). Even though the radar for reputation risk is monitored continuously through BHP, it faces several issues regarded recent late fees. Also, in Australia constant redevelopment is needed with regard to changing environment socially and on corporate basis which was indicated through BHP CEO. When business grow, their responsibility grows and there comes forward a need for risk management instead of undertaking all the risks. BHP financing decisions environmental and social impacts can be monitored over a specific design over a radar for reputation risk. As BHP has provisions for energy and minerals, but it still has distinct priorities when it comes to reporting sustainability with much report amount focused over goals of environment and energy sustainability.
The provider of energy focuses over the customers and it has been driven on customers for making renewable energy changes. Also, the company has the ability of making direct sustainability changes, where the changes of the company have indirect nature through use of energy and material laden policies. Such an industry is changing fast with reduction in available resources of energy present readily and much pressure over such firms for doing the correct thing across the environment (Dunphy et al, 2007). The industry of fast food on the other hand, from the perspective of McDonald’s has been changing at a dynamic rate. When such reports are read, it becomes apparent that BHP has more source of energy driven through environment, economy and sustainability while the McDonalds has sustainability based development driven through customers. This can be because of BHP being within an industry in which fuels have started diminishing and a massive issue is caused by global warming in the public’s eyes and within media.