代写论文：文化的抄袭和技术民主化

代写论文：文化的抄袭和技术民主化

“现成品艺术，拼贴，发现或发现的文本，文本，结合，detournment和拨款，所有这些术语代表抄袭”的探索（“两院”85），因此认为CAE剽窃必须允许。理解CAE意味着什么它是必要的定义为艺术如何被之前和现在。根据CAE技术曾被认为是文化的精英了。这就意味着艺术不应该被复制。然而，在目前的时代，有一个知识爆炸。人们可以获得几乎所有的精英阶层，人们想用艺术文本和非文本来进行实验。CAE验证这种抄袭概念说明任何创作不拥有自身的内在价值。一个文本，一张图片或一首歌将有某种意义，只有当它被连接到一个过程在物理世界。这个连接的过程是什么的定义，因此混音或进行重组，将可能适合不同的意义绝不应被视为抄袭，意义已经改变了的环境已经改变了。
这意味着剽窃CAE状态，它不同于我们所学过的关于剽窃。抄袭与写作是不考虑的基础上。只要是一行或一段文字是用来作为我们的作品或写作，它被认为是抄袭，除非或直到它被引用。上下文没有关系，也不可能被创建的重组，作者必须被引用。

代写论文：文化的抄袭和技术民主化

“Readymades, collage, found art or found text, intertexts, combines, detournment, and appropriation—all these terms represent explorations in plagiarism” (“CAE” 85) and hence argues CAE plagiarism must be allowed. o understand what CAE implies it is necessary to define for how art was viewed before and now. According to CAE Art was once considered culture as presented by the elite. This meant that art should not be copied. However in more current times there is a knowledge explosion. People have access to almost everything that the elite have and people want to experiment with art-text and non-textual. CAE’s validates this plagiaristic notion by stating that any creation does not hold an inherent value of its own. A text, a picture or a song will hold some sort of meaning only when it is connected to a process in the physical world. This connection to the process is what defines it, and hence to remix or to make a recombinant that would probably suit a different meaning should in no way be considered plagiarism, as the meaning has now changed-the context has changed.

This meaning of plagiarism as CAE states it is different from what we have been taught about plagiarism. Plagiarism with respect to writing is not considered based on context. As long as a line or section of text is used as such in our works or writing, it is said to be plagiarism, unless or until it is referenced well. The context does not matter, nor does the recombinant that it might be created in; the author has to be referenced.