代写留学生论文：经济主体

代写留学生论文：经济主体

这本书是一种典型的挑衅性的风格，与主题相关的研究和丰富的数据参考。参考文献和笔记似乎涵盖了整本书。作者的论点是围绕不平等问题展开的，但似乎涉及竞争力，问责制，正义，歧视，民主，社会流动和政治等一系列不同的问题，主要观点是每一个问题都是有效的也受到不平等的影响。
许多经济学家一直在争取更长时间的不平等概念，并提出了公共政策的措施，以显着的方式缓解这个问题（Perry，6）。与收入差距和收入分配有关的问题，已经被与意识形态分工相关的左右两边的通道所利用，成为一种重要的选择武器。这是为了拒绝或支持政府在经济事务中发挥的作用。根据笔者的观点，这个权利似乎把不平等看作是奖励经济主体的市场体系的一个意想不到的结果。除此之外，最重要的论点是前面提到的论点。这是对理论，共和党自由放任和民主新自由主义的极端全面的反驳。
只要收入不平等是能力内不平等的反映点，除了鼓励经济主体通过投资和努力来提高能力，就不能考虑任何错误。另一方面，笔者认为，这个概念是被拒绝的。除此之外，还有人认为，市场失灵是最高层收入和普及的集中体现。

代写留学生论文：经济主体

The book had been written in a typical style of provocativeness with a research related to subject matter and rich reference with respect to data. References and notes seem to be covering the entire book. The arguments of the author revolves around the issue of inequality but seems to be touching a number of different issues involved in competitiveness, accountability, justice, discrimination, democracy, social mobility and politics with the main view that each and every one of them are effective factors and are also impacted by the inequality.
A number of economists have been wrestling with the concept of inequality for a longer duration of time and proposed measures of public policy that would be mitigating the issue in a significant manner (Perry, 6). The problem related to inequality and distribution of income has been utilized by both aisles of right and left side related to the ideological division as a significant weapon of option. This is done for rejecting or supporting the role played by government in the affairs of economy. The right, according to the author, seems to be considering inequality as an unintended result of the system of market that rewards the agents of economy. In addition to this, the most significant argument placed is the one stated previously. This is that extreme comprehensive counterargument to both the theories, Republican laissez- faire and Democratic neoliberalism.
So long as the inequality of income is the reflective point of inequality within the capability, and nothing wrong can be considered regarding it except the encouragement of economic agents for improving the capabilities by their investment and effort. On the other hand, it has been identified by the author, there is rejection to this notion. In addition to this, it has been argued that failure in market is concentration of income and pervasiveness at the top most level.