大学申请文书：西澳大利亚报纸新闻

大学申请文书：西澳大利亚报纸新闻

本文另一个必不可少的好角度,西澳大利亚的是这篇文章代表了问题不是以戏剧性的方式,但在一个简化的方式仅供读者承认这个问题有因果关系(飞,2009)。根据Whyte-Venebles,(2010),约定模型专注在记者作为新闻。的过程,而新闻是一个双重交易包括生产者的新闻和接收器的新闻尽管它们之间的关系是模糊与公民新闻和交互媒体迅速增长(Wolfsfeld, 2011)。少做了定义要素,描述基于新闻受众感知。这是特别,因为它将明显不可能定义一个通用因素产生大众利益。

大学申请文书：西澳大利亚报纸新闻
基于这样的判断,很明显,任何可以威胁和平的人,他们的幸福和繁荣的文章的新闻头条的可能性(飞,2009)。这是必要的证明的观点描述了这两种选择的新闻文章。宽差异背后的原因是明显的视角在新闻议程是不同的(博加特,2013)。新闻框架是自发的,而在其他更无竞争的主导。因此,从的角度来看这篇文章,相信西澳大利亚报纸新闻呈现良好的一个例子。

大学申请文书：西澳大利亚报纸新闻

Another essential good perspective in the article by West Australia was the fact that the article represented the issue not in a dramatic manner, but in a simplified manner for a reader to only acknowledge the issue as having a cause and effect relationship (Flew, 2009). According to Whyte-Venebles, (2010), convention models focus over what journalists regard as news. Rather the process of news is a dual one with transactions inclusive of both producers of news and receivers of news even though the relationship between them is blurring rapidly with citizen journalism and interaction media growth (Wolfsfeld, 2011). Less has been done for defining essential factors, which depict news based audience perception. This is especially because it would be apparent is impossible to define a general factor which generates mass audience interest.

大学申请文书：西澳大利亚报纸新闻
Basing such judgements, it is evident that anything which can threaten peace of people, their well-being as well as their prosperity is the articles of news which have a likeliness of making headlines (Flew, 2009). This is essential proven by the perspectives depicted in both these selected news articles. The reason behind the wide differences is evident from the perspective that the agenda in both the news is different (Bogart, 2013). The news framing in one is spontaneous, while in the other it is more uncontested and dominant in nature. Therefore, from the perspective of this essay, it is believed that West Australia newspaper has presented an example of good journalism.