北美代写-对颠覆性技术的批判性分析和反思。计划引入颠覆性创新的管理者需要从战略上为公司带来变化，满足消费者的需求，并根据当地市场的需求进行调整。需要考虑其他变量来创建一个破坏性范式。这将强化现有的全球本土化概念和颠覆性创新技术范式。在产品创新和市场创新中，应该考虑新的变量，即约束创新、必须创新和反向创新。需求创新是基于消费者需求的发展概念，约束创新是基于现有资源的发展(De Waal, 2015)。通过对颠覆性创新和全球本土化原则的比较和对比，可以理解为企业的管理者或领导者在考虑当地竞争的同时，需要考虑当地的文化和经济条件。论文范文北美代写-对颠覆性技术的批判性分析和反思分享给留学生阅读。
One of the central criticism revolving the arguments made by Clayton Christenson is that the companies tend to give a lot of importance to the notions of disruptive innovation and is not factored in localization. In this case of larger companies, the managers tend to develop a homogenous approach and do not develop products for all the people. This can be an issue in itself as there should be a glocalized approach that needs to be undertaken in the cases of innovation. Theories of disruptive innovation general tends to give focus to a homogenous approach based on the established developed markets. This causes alienation of the brand with the consumers. There should be an approach that added the local culture of the place. This can be achieved by enhanced local sensitivity of a place (Robertson, 2012).
Hence the managers who plan to bring in disruptive innovation need to strategically bring in changes for the company, address consumer needs and maneuver it according to the needs of the local markets where they operate. In the 77 case study analysis done by Christenson, there are other motivating factors that have been in play by the companies. This essentially questions the notions of the disruptive analysis (King & Baatartogtokh, 2015). There is a need to factor in other variables to create a disruptive paradigm. This would enhance on the existing notions of glocalization and the disruptive innovation technology paradigm. In the case of product and market innovation, there should be newer variables considered, which are constrained innovation, necessities innovation and reverse innovation. Necessity innovation is the concept of development based on the consumer requirements, and constrained innovation is development based on the resources available (De Waal, 2015). From comparing and contrasting the disruptive innovation and glocalization principles, it could be understood that the managers or leaders of the company need to factor in local culture and economic conditions of the place along with considering the local competition. It has been recommended in practical reality that the managers need to create product and services that are based on the local needs of the people. By creating a product with local flavor and customization, there can be development of a global brand. This paradigm shift is not an easy process and all these variables along with dynamic strategic management is mandatory for the creation of newer products.
The methods of combining disruptive innovation and glocalization strategies are discussed below.