如何写求职简历：沃达丰管理层如何分散股东风险

在： ,

如何写求职简历：沃达丰管理层如何分散股东风险

沃达丰管理层需要在当前形势下分散股东风险。这是因为，重要的是，基金经理要在不损害股东利益的前提下，分散股东的风险。经理是那些能更好地考虑公司的人。在分散股东风险的同时，管理者需要考虑沃达丰如何才能比竞争对手做得更好。如果管理者发现他们可以更容易地将战略资产转移到目标行业，那么他们就可以使股东多元化。因此，管理者可以很容易地分散利益相关者的风险，并帮助他们最小化与股东相关的风险。可以认为，管理者对降低股东风险的理解有更好的地方。这是因为他们对公司、业务和未来战略有更广泛的想法。经理们可以很容易地询问股票市场需要引入哪些新的战略资产。
除此之外，管理者应该知道应该模仿什么。同时，管理者需要确保他们所规划的战略资产是否可以被替代。经理人还可以分散股东的风险，因为他们将更加关注沃达丰公司在德国等新市场的成功。股东成为风险的重要组成部分并不容易(Barberi et al .， 2016)。他们寻找那些安定、稳定、完全没有风险的公司。此外，管理者可以以更好的方式做出战略决策，即使是以牺牲公司的短期盈利为代价。此外，当风险消除后，沃达丰将奖励这些经理。中层管理人员也将得到奖励。在同样的帮助下，沃达丰在德国的管理人员也将能够使高管受益，持有不同种类的股权，并将有助于限制公司的流动性和多元化。

如何写求职简历：沃达丰管理层如何分散股东风险

Vodafone managers need to diversify the shareholders risk in the present times. This is because it is important for the managers to diversify the risk of the share holders without damaging the same. Managers are the people who can think about the company in a better manner. While diversifying the risk of the shareholders, the managers need to think how Vodafone can do better than their competitors. Managers can diversify the shareholders if they find that it is easier for them to do the transportation of the strategic assets to their target industry. Thus, Managers can easily diversify the stakeholders risk and help them to minimize the risk associated with the shareholders. It can be assumed that the managers have a much better place for the understanding related to the reduction of the shareholders risk. This is because they have a broader idea related to the company, its business and its future strategies. The managers can easily ask about the new strategic assets which are required to be introduced in the share market.
In addition to this, the managers should know what is to be imitated. Also, the managers need to ensure if the strategic asset planned by them can be substituted. The managers can also diversify the shareholders risk as they will be much more concerned about the success of the Vodafone Company in new markets such as Germany. It is not easily for the share holders to be the part and parcel of the risk (Barberi et al, 2016). They look for the companies which are settled, stabilized and are completely free from risk. Also the managers can take strategic decisions in a better manner even at their expense of near-term earning of the company. Also, the managers will be rewarded by Vodafone when the risks will be eliminated. The middle managers will also be rewarded. With the help of the same, the Vodafone managers in Germany will also be able to benefit the senior executives to hold the different kinds of ownership based stakes and will help to restrict the liquidity and diversification of the company.

圣托马斯大学：Aldi扩张的主要竞争对手

在： ,

圣托马斯大学：Aldi扩张的主要竞争对手

Kwik Save是导致Aldi扩张问题的主要竞争对手之一。然而，在更多的当前时代，Aldi的主要竞争对手将被讨论。竞争的形式有特易购、阿斯达·塞恩斯伯里、莫里森和利德尔。在这些竞争对手中，Aldi和Lidl是主要的折扣店。考虑到Aldi和Lidl确实能提供物有所值、物有所值的商品，因此它们理应占据良好的市场份额，但英国消费者认为，他们在哪里购物是他们在社会中地位的社会指标(Smith & Sparks, 1993)。因此，非折扣超市的市场份额仍然很高。乐购占据了28.2%的市场份额，是最高的。Asda、Sainsbury和Morrisons的市场份额分别为16.7%、16.2%和10.7%。Aldi和Lidl的份额相对较小，分别为5.6%和4.2% (Shadbolt, 2015)。
Aldi的主要竞争对手是Lidl。Lidl也是一家德国折扣店，截至2015年，它被评为全球第四大零售商。它的销售额约为1280亿美元。阿尔迪保持“年度杂货商”的称号已经有一段时间了。Lidl于2014年被授予该称号。Lidl提供了与Aldi相同的优势(Thals, 2015)。它允许员工人数最少，将有深冰柜，客户可以自己访问。除了Aldi提供的优势之外，Lidl还提供了更多的优势。它提供优质品牌、高端葡萄酒、基于地点的服务，以及更多可以使Aldi对英国市场的影响翻番的服务(Thals, 2015)。虽然Lidl现在在市场份额上落后于Aldi，但差距很小，Lidl可以赶上来。其他四个竞争对手Tesco、Asda、Morrisons和Sainsbury目前也在进行战略发展(Shadbolt, 2015)。

圣托马斯大学：Aldi扩张的主要竞争对手

Kwik Save was one of the main competitors that led to issues in expansion for Aldi. However, in more current times Main competitors for Aldi will be discussed. competition in the form of Tesco, Asda Sainsbury, Morrison, and Lidl. Of these competitors Aldi and Lidl are the main discount style stores available for the consumers. While Aldi and Lidl hence should logically command a good market share given that they do supply value and quality for money, UK shoppers believe where they shop is a social indicator of where they stand in society (Smith & Sparks, 1993). Hence, the market share for the non-discount supermarkets are still high. Tesco commands a market share of 28.2 percent and is the highest. Asda, Sainsbury and Morrisons command a market share of 16.7 percent, 16.2 percent and 10.7 percent respectively. Aldi and Lidl on a comparative note share a much smaller percentage in the amount of 5.6 percent and 4.2 percent respectively (Shadbolt, 2015).
Aldi’s main competitor is Lidl. Lidl is also a German discount store and as of 2015 was ranked as being the fourth largest retailer in the world. It has around 128$ billion in sales. Aldi had retained the title of ‘Grocer of the year’ for some time now. Lidl was given the title in 2014. Lidl provides the same advantages as Aldi (Thals, 2015). It allows staffing to be minimal, there will be deep freezers which the customers can access themselves. In addition to the advantages that Aldi provides, Lidl also adds more. It offers premium brands, high end wines, locations based services and more that could double the Aldi effect on the UK market (Thals, 2015). Although Lidl is now behind Aldi when it comes to market share, the difference is minimal and Lidl could catch up. The other four competitors Tesco, Asda, Morrisons and Sainsbury are also developing strategically at present (Shadbolt, 2015).

essay修改：印度的内部发展

在： ,

essay修改：印度的内部发展

上世纪90年代以前，印度面临的主要障碍是其奉行的自给自足政策。与中国类似，印度的大部分发展都是对内进行的，而且只对发展中国家做出贸易承诺。然而，这种自给自足的政策非但没有促进增长，反而被认为造成了增长停滞，最终这些国家也向其他发达国家开放了贸易。在更现代的时代，开发计划署提出的印度排在第130位。虽然这一排名比2014年的135分有所提高，但增幅仍然很小。例如，从2014年到2013年，中国的预期寿命从68岁增长到了67.6岁。国民总收入增长了约338%。增长放缓的原因可能源于印度经济增长依赖石油进口和农业。由于中国依赖能源进口，而且在很大程度上依赖农业部门，因此消费者的变化无常。
随着不可预测的季风，通货膨胀率发生了变化。高企的财政债务也是一个因素。2009-2011年的重大经济问题也对其发展产生了影响。然而，在国内，由于社会结构的不平等问题，该国被认为面临着各种问题。该国的人类发展率也是根据性别发展指数计算的。在GDI方面，女性的人类发展指数HDI值为0.525，男性的HDI值为0.660。因此，2014年的GDI值为0.795。基于此，该国的性别不平等指数为0.563 (UNDP, 2016)。不仅在印度，女性的劳动参与率也在下降，这是一种趋势。这似乎正在推动印度一些行业的下滑。

essay修改：印度的内部发展

The major obstacles to India before the 1990s was the policy of autarky that it followed. Similar to China, India directed most of its development inward and also made trade commitments only with developing nations. However, instead of increasing its growth this policy of autarky was seen to create stagnant growth and ultimately the countries opened up to trading with other developed nations also. In more current times, India as presented by the UNDP is at position 130. While this is an improvement with the 135 score it had in 2014, the increase in ranking is still only meagre. For instance, the life expectancy of the country was seen to increase from 68 years to 67.6 years between 2014 and 2013. Gross National Income increased by around 338 per cent. The reasons for the slow growth could be rooted in that India relies on oil imports and agriculture for its growth. Volatile consumer changes exist because the country is dependent on energy imports and also the country is largely dependent on the agro sector.
With unpredictable monsoons the inflation rates change. The high fiscal debt is also a contributor. The major economic issues around 2009-2011 also had an impact on its development. However, internally the country is seen to face issues because of inequality issues in its social structure. The Human Development rates for the country is also based on the Gender development index. In terms of the GDI, the female Human Development Index HDI values was 0.525 and for males, the HDI was 0.660. A GDI value of 0.795 is hence resulted in for the year 2014. Based on this the gender inequality index for the country is 0.563 (UNDP, 2016). It is a trend noted not only in India, that workforce participation rates of women have gone down. This is seen to be driving decline in some sectors in India.