論文翻譯推薦：人力資源部門與直線經理的衝突

在： ,

論文翻譯推薦：人力資源部門與直線經理的衝突
在涉及雪山度假酒店的案例中，很明顯，該度假酒店已經擁有大量的固定員工，這就要求該度假酒店維持自己的人力資源部門。人道主義事務部感到關切的是，沒有時間有效地履行人力資源責任。這是由於本部門需要管理大量與人力資源相關的行政文書工作(McGovern, 2012)。雪山人力資源部門與其分部門分擔責任，不如考慮增加自己的人員。新員工的職責主要集中在人力資源部門的管理和文書工作上。為了消除人力資源經理對實踐人力資源服務缺乏時間的主要擔憂，應該增加員工來分擔行政責任。還有一個與樓層管理和管理者執行人力資源規定有關的問題，應該得到妥善處理。員工在現場也有責任警惕和執行與人力資源相關的問題。很明顯，直線經理反對參與協助或分擔人力資源部門的任何職責(Marchington & Wilkinson, 2012)。
這是人力資源部門和更高管理層必須解決的首要問題。直線經理沒有表現出任何參與人力資源的興趣，這清楚地表明了組織內部員工的分歧(Hayre, 2015)。這使得解決這個問題變得很重要，因為如果人力資源經理缺乏一線和基層經理的支持，他們就無法行使自己的人力資源權力。管理人員也有責任在現場監督和維護其團隊成員的某些標準和規章。由於直線經理明顯拒絕了人力資源部門之前的援助請求，人力資源部門開始逐步提拔替代員工經理是很重要的。任何曾在大型組織工作過的工作人員都知道，通常每個人的日常日程都預留了充足的額外時間。拒絕協助人力資源部門做一些雜務，顯然可以被稱為對組織發展的疏忽和無知。

論文翻譯推薦：人力資源部門與直線經理的衝突

In the case linked to the Snow Mountain resort, it’s clear that the resort already has a large number of permanent employees, which requires the resort to maintain its own HR department. The concern experienced by the department is the lack of time to practice human resource responsibilities effectively. This is due the large amount of HR related administrative paperwork to be managed within the department (McGovern, 2012). Rather than splitting the department and sharing responsibilities, it’s more advisable for the Snow Mountain HR department to consider increasing its own personnel. The duties and responsibilities or new associates would be focused towards management of the HR department and its paperwork. To eliminate the HR manager’s main concern of the lack of time for practicing HR services, the staff should be increased to share the administrative responsibilities. There is also the problem linked to floor management and implementation of HR regulations by the managers, which should be addressed properly.The staff members also have the responsibility vigilance and implementation of HR related issues while on the floor. It’s clear that the line managers are against being involved in assisting or sharing any of the HR department’s responsibilities (Marchington & Wilkinson, 2012).
This makes this the first concern, which the HR department and higher management must address. The failure of line manager to show any interest towards being involved in HR clearly shows a divide within the organization’s staff (Hayre, 2015). This makes it important to address this concern and issue since the HR manager cannot implement their HR powers if they lack the support from the line and floor managers. It’s the responsibility of the managers to also participate towards monitoring and maintaining certain criterion and regulations of their team members while on the floor.With the line managers clearly rejecting the HR department’s previous requests for assistance, it’s important for the HR department to begin gradually promoting alternative staff managers. Any staff member who has worked for a large organization will know that there is usually ample of extra time reserved for each individual’s daily schedule. Rejecting to assist the HR department in doing some chores can clearly be termed as negligence and ignorance towards the organization’s development.

英文代写：技术人工制品

在： ,

英文代写：技术人工制品

重新定义问题:当任何用户或开发人员在使用或操作任何技术人工制品时发现任何问题或问题，就会导致当前人工制品的关闭。技术人工制品的设计可以随着用户或技术开发人员需求的变化，与其他问题一起重新定义。由于技术的高速发展，以前使用的技术可能会过时，并不能为用户提供优势(Watson, 2011)。这是关闭技术文物的主要原因。可以看出，技术封闭不是永久性的。然而，每一种技术产品都需要在使用上具有灵活性，并且应该具有足够的灵活性来吸引更多的用户。技术理论的社会建构，在取得各种技术成果的同时，也面临着来自社会各界的批评。对技术社会建设理论的最大批判是;人们指责科技产品或硬件是为特定的部分而制造的，而且产品缺乏标准化。技术社会建设理论关注的是技术的发展及其如何为社会提供优势。
这个理论没有考虑技术如何以消极的方式影响社会。因为技术发展在许多方面被视为成功的标准。在此基础上，归化理论得到了更大的重视。众所周知，当一个国家或开发商了解到自己所开发技术的不足之处时，他们会更有效率。因此，为了分析技术人工制品的效率和不足，需要对用户进行更多的反馈和访谈。这些反馈将为开发新的和改进的人工制品奠定基础。通过这种方式，驯化理论得到了应有的重视，因为它支持这样的过程(Hynes和Richardson, 2009)。许多开发人员已经注意到，如果当前的技术人工制品不影响更改，那么就其结果而言，更改将变得过时或效率更低。因此，需要定期更新或升级，以保持它的工作。

英文代写：技术人工制品

Following are some examples of closure reasons that can close technology artefacts:Redefinition of Problem: When any user or developer finds any issue or problem while using or operating any technology artefacts then it results in closure of current artefact. Design of technology artefact in question can be redefined with other problem with the change in requirement of user or developer of technology. Since technology has been developing at great speed therefore previously used technology can became outdated and does not provide advantage to its user (Watson, 2011). This is main reason of closure of technology artefacts.It can be observed that technology closure is not permanent. However what is required in every technology artefacts is flexibility in its use and it should be flexible enough to attract more users to it. Apart from achievement of various technology artefacts, social construction of technology theory has also faced and still faces some criticism from different sections of society. Biggest criticism of social construction of technology theory is that; people blame that technology artefacts or hardware are made for particular section and there is lacks of standardisation in artefacts. Social construction of technology theory focuses on development of technology and how it has provided advantage to society.
This theory does not consider how technology has impacted society in negative manner.Since technology development has been viewed as criteria of success in many ways. On the basis of this concept, domestication theory has gained greater importance. It is well known fact that country or developer will be more efficient when they know shortcomings in developed technology. Thus, to analyse efficiency and shortcomings of technology artefacts, more feedbacks and interviews of users should be taken. These feedbacks will form base for the development of new and improved artefact. In this manner, domestication theory has gained due importance as it supports such process (Hynes and Richardson, 2009). It has been observed by many developers that, if changes is not affected in current technology artefacts, then it will became obsolete or less efficient in terms of its results. Therefore, regular updating or up gradation is required to keep it working.