代做assignment：电影与历史记载的区别

在： ,

代做assignment：电影与历史记载的区别

然而，阅读历史和所有与之相关的微小事件，以及以一种简洁的方式在视频上观看历史，是有区别的。内战的主要事件都被很好地记录下来了。在电影中出现的几乎每一个事件中，都有一个字幕来帮助观众理解时间、人物和事件。电影中大部分的焦点都集中在会议上，因为这些会议是历史创造中一些更重要的事件。历史事件是人类创造的;伟大的领袖领导并支持这项运动。电影中的领导人毛泽东由唐国强饰演，另一个主要人物是国民党的蒋介石，由张国立饰演。在早期的会议中，两位领导人都以一种观众毫不怀疑的方式展现出来，他们都同样强大。他们都是孙中山的信徒，孙中山建立了中国的第一个共和国。读历史书时，人们往往会读到更多关于领导人民革命的领导人以及目前存在着行政基础的领导人的资料。
读这本书的人很有可能无法真正理解是谁领导了反对派，他们的理想是什么，或者在这种情况下，这个人和这个政党有多腐败，即使这个人本身被描绘成一个性格坚强的人。国民党一直以公正的方式代表，目前的媒体报道暗示这部电影可能会在2016年上映。但是，在看电影的同时，也在看《每日电讯报》上的一些电影评论时，可以看出，在当今时代，一些电影对白可能是国民党难以接受的。电影中国民党被自己的事业打败了。这在历史文学中也是一种表现。关于这一主题的文献研究表明，国民党对这一主题的研究表明，在共产党成立并领导国家的革命转型时，中国是一个破败不堪的国家(邹，1999)。当时国民党内部存在着帝国主义分子，帝国主义意识形态在统治中占主导地位。

代做assignment：电影与历史记载的区别

However, there is a difference in reading history and all the minute events that contributed to it, and watching history in a concise manner on video. The main events of the civil war have been captured very well. In almost every event that is presented in the movie, it has a captioning to help the audience understand the time, the character and the event. Most of the focus in the movie have been on meetings, as these meetings were some of the more important events in the creation of history. The historical events were created by men; great leaders led and supported the movement. The leader Mao Zedong was represented in the movie by Tang Guoqiang and the other main character was Chiang Kai-shek of the KMT who is portrayed by Zhang Guoli. In the early meeting, both leaders are represented in a way that the viewer is left in no doubt that both were just as powerful. They are both the disciples of the person who set up the country’s first republic, Sun Yat-sen. In reading a history book, one tends to read more on the leader who led the civil revolution and the one whose foundation of administration is currently existent.
There are chances that the person reading it might not get the actual understanding on who led the opposition, what their ideals were, or in this case how corrupted the person and party was, even though the person themselves was represented as a strong personality. The KMT has been represented in a fair way and the current media reports suggest that this movie might get released in 2016. However, when watching the movie and also reading some of the movie commentary on the Telegraph, it can be seen that some movie dialogues might be difficult for the KMT to accept in present times. KMT is shown in the movie as having suffered defeat by its own undertakings. This is indeed a representation in historical literature, too. Literature research on the subject shows that the KMT Research studies on the subject shows that China was a dilapidated state when the Communist party was created and led the revolutionary transformation of the state (Tsou, 1999). It was a time when the imperialist elements existed in the KMT and the imperialist ideology was much more dominant in the ruling.

加拿大论文代写推荐：《南海各方行为宣言》

在： ,

加拿大论文代写推荐：《南海各方行为宣言》

这种气氛在1992年发生了变化，当时中国就对这些地区的主权要求颁布了一部新法律。对此，东盟各国外长发表了关于菲律宾倡议的声明。他们发表了《马尼拉宣言》，要求各方保持克制。越南驻马尼拉大使对外长的声明表示支持。中国政府称，宣言中有许多积极因素。当出现包括石油和天然气等碳氢化合物的需求增长以满足世界经济快速增长的需要在内的事态发展时，争端进一步加剧。这导致了中国经济的快速增长。1996年，中国发表基线声明，重申对该地区的主权。之后，《联合国海洋法公约》无意中加剧和竞争了海洋空间的控制权。在冷战结束后的1990年代初，建立了一种新的多边合作安排。
正因为如此，东南亚区域讨论的重点是努力建立信心和促进印度尼西亚和加拿大等不同国家为管理该区域的冲突而进行的职能合作。为了避免这些领域的敏感问题，举办了一些讲习班。虽然双方的合作在1995年中国占领离菲律宾更近的南海美济礁地区时受到了重大打击。会后，东盟发表了对中方倡议的关切声明。由于中国的占领，菲律宾当时面临着巨大的压力。由于美国在1992年关闭军队的后果，菲律宾还面临许多内部问题。菲律宾和中国之间的紧张关系一直持续到1997-98年。此后，东盟提出与中国就“南海行为准则”进行谈判，以避免在该地区发生对抗。为了达成协议，花了大约四年的时间。它被称为《南海各方行为宣言》。为了进一步实施这些指导方针，花了9年时间。

加拿大论文代写推荐：《南海各方行为宣言》

This atmosphere changed in 1992 when China issued a new law on its claims over these regions. In response to the same, ASEAN Foreign Ministers issued over the Philippines initiative for South East Nations. They launched the declaration known as Manila declaration which asked the parties to exercise self-restraint. The Vietnamese Ambassador in Manila expressed their support for the statement of the foreign minister. Chinese government claimed that there were many positive elements in the declaration. The disputes were further increased when there were developments including the growth in the demands of hydrocarbons such as oil and natural gas to satisfy the needs of fast growing economies of the world. This gives rise to the fast growing economy in China. Further in 1996, China issued the baseline Declaration which led to the reiteration of its sovereignty over this region. After, this there was unintended consequence by UNCLOS to exacerbate and compete for the control of the maritime spaces.Still in the earlier 1990s, after the end of Cold War, there was a building of a new multilateral cooperative arrangement.
Due to this, the regional discourses on South East Asia were dominated by the efforts to build the confidence and to promote functional cooperation by different nations such as Indonesia and Canada to manage the conflicts over this region. There were a number of workshops done in order to avoid sensitive issues in these areas. Though the mutual cooperation observed a major blow during the times of 1995 when China Occupied the region of Mischief reef in South China Sea, which was closer to Philippines. After this ASEAN issued a concern statement for the initiative that was taken by China. Philippines during those times faced a huge pressure because of this occupation by China. Philippines was also facing many internal issues because of the consequences of the closure of the military forces by US in 1992. The tensions between Philippines and China continued to grow till 1997-98. After this, ASEAN offered a negotiation on the Code of Conduct (COC) with China to prevent the confrontations over this region. In order to reach an agreement, it took around four years. It was termed as the Declaration of Conduct of Parties in South China Sea. In order to implement the guidelines further, it took nine years.

加拿大论文被怀疑代写：圣贝南多事件

在： ,

加拿大论文被怀疑代写：圣贝南多事件

圣贝南多事件是全球安全形势严峻的一个例子。还有许多迫在眉睫的威胁，政府想要保护人民(林德和兰金39)。从伦理的角度来看，人的安全比个人隐私更重要似乎是合理的。政府一再声明这一原因，但这也妨碍了个人隐私和公民自由。有些人选择从事欺骗活动，其目的就是要造成伤害。因此，为了安全起见，在某些情况下隐私需要被妥协，这似乎是合理的(Pearson 7)。尽管与政府共享信息会产生一些风险和安全漏洞，但由于目前的情况，安全变得势在必行。根据1789年颁布的所有令状法，苹果公司在提供援助时应遵守政府的命令，这是一个判例。这个法令几乎和宪法一样古老，宪法赋予政府保护国家的广泛控制权。同样在1977年美国诉纽约电话案中，“所有令状法案”被用来做出裁决(Opderbeck和Hurwitz 8)。法官命令苹果公司向联邦政府提供援助。
本案开创的先例是立法更加重视人民的安全(Opderbeck, and Hurwitz 8)，这是政府在做决定时考虑的首要因素。这成为了安全和隐私的经典案例。政府表示，在圣贝纳迪诺事件中，年轻的已婚夫妇同情伊斯兰国武装分子。随后，14人在枪击事件中丧生，22人受伤。他们使用的是iPhone 5c (Opderbeck和Hurwitz 3)，而苹果拒绝帮助黑掉这款手机。法官命令他们在破案过程中给予政府合理的技术援助。政府声明苹果拒绝调查这款手机。然而，苹果首席执行官表示，事实并非如此。自1990年以来，政府一直试图在所有手机中安装一种用于监控的小芯片。一些分析人士警告说，这践踏了个人的基本自由权利。这也将开创政府可以控制个人自由和信息的先例。政府有可能过度控制。这将导致死锁情况。

加拿大论文被怀疑代写：圣贝南多事件

San Bernando case is an example of how severe the situation regarding security is across the world. There are many more imminent threats the government wants to protect the people (Lind and Rankin 39). From an ethical standpoint, it does seem reasonable that the security of people is more important than privacy of individuals. Government has repeatedly stated this reason but this also impedes on individual privacy and civil liberties. Some people choose to act in deceitful activities with the very notion of causing harm. Hence, it does seem reasonable that for the sake of security, in some instances privacy needs to be compromise (Pearson 7). Even though there are a number of risks and security vulnerabilities that arise from sharing information with the government, owing to the current situation, security becomes imperative.The precedent used to make the legal determination that Apple should comply with the governmental mandates in providing assistance was set forth using 1789 All Writs law. This statute is almost as old as the constitution, which gives government broad controlling powers for the protection of the state. Similarly in 1977 US vs. New York Telephone, “All Writs Acts” was used to make the determination (Opderbeck, and Hurwitz 8). Apple even asked if this law extends to the third party vendors. The judge ordered Apple to provide assistance for the federal government.
The precedent that this case sets is that legislations give more importance to the security of the people (Opderbeck, and Hurwitz 8). This is the primary factor that the government considers while making a determination.This becomes a classic case of security versus privacy. Government states that in the case of San Bernardino, young married couple sympathized with the Islamic State militants. Subsequently, 14 people were killed and 22 were injured in a shooting rampage. They had used iPhone 5c (Opderbeck, and Hurwitz 3). Apple refused to help hack into the phone. The judge ordered that they give reasonable technical assistance to the government in solving of the crime. Government stated that Apple refused to look into this specific phone. Nevertheless, Apple CEO states that this is simply not the case. Government has been trying from 1990 onwards to introduce a small chip in all the phones for surveillance purpose. Some analysts warn that this tramples basic freedom rights of individuals. This would also set a precedent that governments can control individual freedom and information. There is a possibility of excessive governmental control. This leads to a deadlock situation.