essay代写价格:澳大利亚人与咖啡

essay代写价格:澳大利亚人与咖啡

首先,星巴克在产品优化方面不够专注。他们只是复制了在美国和澳大利亚行之有效的营销策略。在美国,这种咖啡的产品特点是使用甜糖浆,大量的牛奶,增加了咖啡的淡味和苦味。只有很少的产品范围包括主要是热滑咖啡为基础,但不是一个良好的产品宽度的咖啡。然而,澳大利亚人的消费偏好一直是真正的浓咖啡。他们在这样的咖啡环境中长大,这使得星巴克很难销售他们的产品。将澳大利亚的咖啡文化描述为复杂和成熟是谨慎的。因此,随着星巴克在2000年进入澳大利亚,它已经有了一个城市的咖啡文化繁荣,已经到位。然而,建立在澳大利亚的文化是对小型精品店的光顾,人们愿意走自己喜欢的路去喝自己喜欢的咖啡,特别是在墨尔本,咖啡有一群狂热的追随者。对于澳大利亚人来说,咖啡可以像一种关系,就像它与产品的关系一样。
这表明,全球性和非人性化的全球性连锁店,如星巴克,将面临困难,复制熟悉,个性化,和亲密的郊区精品咖啡馆。此外,与亚洲人或美国人不同的是,许多澳大利亚人在喝了多年咖啡之后,他们的味觉发展得更加成熟,喜欢吃更浓更直的糖,而不需要用糖浆来掩盖味道。对咖啡的热爱很容易量化。澳大利亚市场的价值约为300万美元。其中180万美元用于咖啡零售市场。在国外消费的咖啡和在国内消费的咖啡的比例大约是1比2(澳大利亚亚洲专业咖啡协会,2006)。据估计,咖啡的人均消费量比30年前增加了2.3公斤。虽然就速溶咖啡而言,澳大利亚人是世界上消费最多的国家之一,但他们在户外喝咖啡的趋势却越来越明显。

essay代写价格:澳大利亚人与咖啡

First, the Starbucks was inattentive when it came to the product optimization. They just copied the marketing strategies that worked in United States in Australia. The product features of the coffee that work in Unites States has been with the use of syrups of sweet flavour, huge quantities of milk, which augmented a weak and bitter coffee. There is very little product range included mostly hot smoothes that are coffee based, but not a good product breadth of coffee. However, the consumer preference of the Australians has been the real espresso. They are raised on such coffee types which made it harder for the Starbucks to sell their products. It is prudent to describe the coffee culture in Australia as sophisticated and mature. Therefore, with the entry of Starbucks in Australia in the year 2000, it already got an urban coffee culture thriving that was already in place. However, the culture that was established in Australia was the patronization with respect to the small coffee shops in boutique style with the will of the people to travel out of their way for their favoured cup of coffee, particularly in Melbourne where coffee enjoys a cult following. To the Australians, coffee can be related to the extent of being like a relationship as its relationship with the product.
This suggests that global and an impersonal global chain such as Starbucks would face trouble to replicate the familiarity, personalization, and intimacy with a suburban boutique café. Moreover, with years of drinking coffee, a large number of Australians, unlike Asians or Americans had then development of a palate that was sophisticated with enjoyment of sugar stronger and straighter, without having the need of disguising the flavouring the taste with syrup shots.There is easy quantification with regards to the love for coffee. The worth of Australian market is about $3 million. Out of this, $1.8 million is in relation to the retail market of coffee. The ratio between the coffee that has the consumption out of home to the coffee that has the consumption at home is about one is to two (Austral Asian Specialty Coffee Association, 2006). The coffee’s consumption per capita has been estimated at 2.3 kg more than what the consumption was thirty years ago. Although in terms of instant coffee, Australians are one of the highest consumers in the world, there is increasing trend that they are having their coffee outside home.

加拿大 代写:经济学

加拿大 代写:经济学

选择的第一篇文章是Tullock G.(1984)的《公共利益理论的(部分)复兴》,这篇文章与公共利益理论有关。选择的第二篇文章是Winden, F.V.(1999)的《论利益集团的经济理论:迈向政治经济学中的一个群体参照系》,这篇文章与经济利益集团理论有关。这些文章将按照评价来源的五项标准标准进行评价。评估的五个标准是货币、可靠性、覆盖面、准确性和作者资格。考虑到货币的标准,这篇文章发表于1999年。它可以被认为是适合本研究的目的,并已被确定为Kluwer学术出版的财产。考虑到可靠性的标准,本文作者Frans Van Winden是阿姆斯特丹经济学院教授经济学,也是位于阿姆斯特丹大学认知科学中心的个人兴趣所在。主要研究方向为实验经济学、神经经济学、行为经济学和政治经济学。
因此,可靠性的标准可以被认为是适合的研究。在此基础上,还可以验证作者的凭据。考虑到覆盖范围的标准,本文考虑对经济利益集团理论的建立进行评价。尽管已经取得了重大的进展,但在知识方面仍然存在着足够的实质性缺陷,然而,有人认为这个问题的部分原因在于公共选择理论的发展。方法论的个人主义导致了对人类行为的过分个人化的看法。此外,人们对不完全信息的重要性认识不足。因此,可以认为本文的准确性适合本研究的目的。考虑到准确性的标准,这篇研究文章得到了该领域内一些作者的观点和事实的支持。通过对不同文献的考虑,对研究的每一个次要事实的验证都是按照所提供的文本内文献进行的。

加拿大 代写:经济学

The first article selected is “A (partial) rehabilitation of the public interest theory”, by Tullock G. (1984) that is related to Public Interest Theory. The second article selected is “On the economic theory of interest groups: Towards a group frame of reference in political economics” by Winden, F.V. (1999) that is related to the Economic Interest Group Theory. These articles will be evaluated in accordance with the five standard criteria for evaluation of sources. The five criteria of evaluation are currency, reliability, coverage, accuracy and author credentials.Considering the criteria of currency, the article was published in the year 1999. It can be considered appropriate for the purpose of this research, and it has been identified as the property of Kluwer Academic Publishing. Considering the criteria of reliability, the author of this article Frans Van Winden is a professor of Amsterdam School of Economics teaching economics, and is also the personal interest at the Cognitive Science Centre that is located at the University of Amsterdam. His key interests of research area are in the fields of experimental economics, neuron-economics, behavioural economics and political economics.
Hence, the criteria of reliability can be considered as appropriate for the research. Based on this, the credentials of the author can be verified as well. Considering the criteria of coverage, this article has considered evaluating the establishment of economic interest group theories. Even though significant progress has been, there is existence of sufficient substantial lacunae within the knowledge, yet arguing that part of this issue is the way in which there is development of the public choice theory. The individualism of methodology has resulted in providing an over-individualized view about the behaviour of humans. In addition, there has been an underexposure of the significance of imperfect information. Hence, it can be stated that the accuracy of this article is appropriate for the purpose of this research. Considering the criteria of accuracy, the research article has been supported by the views and facts stated by a number of authors within the field. The verification of each and every secondary fact of the research by the consideration of different references are in accordance with the in-text references provided.