PS代写教你区分PS和SP

PS代写教你区分PS和SP

大多数准备出国的同学们只听说过PS,很少有知道SP的。申请文书写作,SP和PS对于对申请不太了解的同学们来说,好像是学校给的要求写错了一样。但是学校要求没有错,同学们也没有看错。它们虽然都是个人陈述的意思,但又有一些区别。下面PS代写老师就为大家详细介绍加拿大留学PS和SP的区别。

1、名字的叫法:

首先,SP是Statement of Purpose,也是我们最常说的个人陈述,也会被人称为SoP;而PS一般是指Personal

Statement,也会被我们称为小PS!

作为理工科研究生申请的同学们,没错,你们最常需要提供的就是第一个,SP, 个人陈述。

2、字数:

这也是最直接的不同,就像谍战剧中最终暴露自己身份的特征一样,字数的不同极大可能的展示了SP和PS的不同;申请文书写作,一般来说,SP字数在800-1000字左右,而PS的字数则在500字以内,即可!

3、内容要求:

申请文书写作,这个区别可以被当做是区分SP和PS这两个“伪装人员”最好的依据哦!

PS一般会要求申请者阐述自己的特殊经历,比如难忘的事,对自己特别有影响的经历。从要求可以看出,PS更看重一种感性上的提升,而不是单纯地专业技能的提升;而且,一般来说PS就像讲故事一样,很少涉及专业知识,只是向学校展示自己与众不同的方面。

不同的是,SP一般来说偏学术型,它要求申请者提供自己在学习和研究以及自己在专业上如何一步一步得到提升;它的内容主体一般会是讲述自己在大学专业学习过程中所遇到的困难以及达成的成就;为了写出水平,一般建议申请者在写SP的过程中提供具体的事例,比如自己遇到过什么问题,怎么解决的,结果如何;你要注意,这个过程就像用行动证明自己一样,不写大话空话是必须要遵守的准则之一;另外SP也会要求申请者阐述自己的择校原因和职业目标;用文字来阐述自己为何要申请这所学校,职业目标会展现你自己是一个有计划,思维严谨的人。

4、不是每个学校都需要提供小PS:

申请文书写作,一般来说,文书中简历、个人陈述和推荐信是每个学校都会要求申请者提交的,而小PS则不然;理工科申请硕士或者博士时,多数学校不需要小PS,如果你对加州比较感兴趣,那么你很有可能就需要准备这么一篇小PS了;另外,密歇根安娜堡和密歇根州立也是需要申请者提供小PS的;说了这么多,你们有没有感觉自己对于PS和SP的区别更清晰一些了呢?

以上的内容是经过多年的经验总结,得出的写作方法,加拿大高阶论文AdvancedThesis教育网在同行业的代写服务机构中以适中的价格,优质的服务,赢得了广大客户群体的称赞,并因此拥有了一大批新老客户。如果需要了解加拿大PS代写,可点击上方栏目列表询问客服人员,我们将会耐心,热情的为您解答,给您建议。

代写演讲稿ppt:团队合作

代写演讲稿ppt:团队合作

我认为有一些个人特质需要我进一步的发展。这些属性是按优先级的时间导向,有效地与团队成员沟通,并有助于健康的讨论(Laguador 2015)。每一个特质,一旦养成,将有助于我提高我的就业能力和未来的可能性。这是因为越来越多的组织正在转向虚拟化,他们更喜欢自己的团队在虚拟环境中表现良好。科技在很大程度上改变了我们的沟通方式。因此,通过参与讨论和博客写作来培养健康的沟通是有益的。在未来,作为一名市场研究和咨询师,只有当我意识到激励的重要性时,我才会成功。我寻求提供这些属性和技能,通过确保对技术的实际使用,并接受它,同时作为团队成员学习确定方向,从而将弱点描述为我的优势(Makki等,2015年)。由于我没有经验,我的技能应该能够在其他有抱负的人面前以最好的竞争方式代表我,从而根据我的喜好增加被录用的机会。
作为团队项目的一部分,团队成员互相了解,并且每个人都能听到每个人的想法。然而,为了使他们的想法超越他们试图提出他们的观点作为优越。根据塔克曼的团队发展阶段,一个团队需要经历四个不同的阶段,包括规范阶段、形成阶段、风暴阶段和形成阶段。我们的团队也经历了这些阶段。直到我们的团队进入规范化阶段,我才开始作为一个个体面对困难(Riley-Douchet et al . 1997)。我相信这是因为我不习惯让别人拒绝我的想法,我在倾听别人的时候也有问题。然而,我们的组长非常好,他帮助我们完成了这个项目。我们团队的领导者在大多数情况下选择了一种变革型的领导方式,使他在各种情况下都具有灵活性。我认为这是我们能够成功完成项目的唯一原因,也是领导能够把团队团结起来,高效工作的唯一原因。

代写演讲稿ppt:团队合作

I think there are some personal attributes that require further development in me. These attributes are time orientation as per priority, communicating effectively with team members and contributing towards healthy discussions (Laguador 2015). Each of these is such attribute that once fostered will help me enhance my employment ability and probability in future. This is because more and more organizations are turning virtual and they prefer their teams to perform well in a virtual environment. Technology has changed the way we communicate to a large extent. Therefore, fostering healthy communication through taking part in discussions and blog writing will prove to be beneficial. In future, as a marketing research and a consultant, I will be successfully only when I realize the importance of being motivated. I seek to furnish these attributes and skills depicting weakness into my strengths by ensuring pragmatic use of technology and embracing it along with learning to orient as a team member (Makki et al 2015). As I have no experience, my skills should be able to represent me in the best possible competitive manner in front of other aspirants so as to increase the chance of getting employed as per my preference.
The team members got to know one another as a part of the group project and at most every individual heard to everyone. However, in order to get their idea above they tried to put forth their view as superior. As per the team development of stage by Tuckman, there are four different stages by which a team has to go by including norming, forming, storming and forming. These were the stages our team also went through. It was only when our team reached the norming stage that I started to face difficulties as an individual (Riley-Douchet et al 1997). I believe it was because of the fact that I was not used to getting my ideas rejected by others and I had problems listening to others. However, our team leader was very good who helped us to complete the project. Leader of our team at most of times chose a transformational kind of leadership which rendered him flexibility under various kinds of situation. I am of the view that this was the sole reason why we were able to complete the project successfully and the leader was capable of putting together team and working efficiently.