留学 文书：贫困和卫生服务之间的关系

在： ,

留学 文书：贫困和卫生服务之间的关系

汉密尔顿社区是人民面临的真正问题的一个例子。本文结合社区提供的卫生服务的背景，详细探讨了经济差距和贫富差距。这一反映的目的是了解贫穷与人民提供的保健服务之间的复杂关系。本文对这一问题进行了总结和反思。从这篇文章中可以了解到，贫困和卫生服务之间有一定的联系。对这一地区的分析提供了各个社会所面临的问题。许多报告支持这一基本论点。汉密尔顿社区证明，医疗服务是根据人们的财富提供的。人民之间的经济差距越来越大，向人民提供的基本服务的质量各不相同。这可以用房价作为一个指标来理解。卡莱尔周围的弗朗伯勒社区平均售价为49万美元。根据2006年的数据，在靠近钢铁厂的哈密尔顿市中心，平均房价为89000美元。在此之后，出生在贫困社区的人开始有了劣势。

留学 文书：贫困和卫生服务之间的关系
他们的经济地位不是因为懒惰，而是多种因素的综合作用。由于这个因素，在这个病例中，医院的花费也有3400万美元的差异。这说明内城医院资源有限。在较贫穷的市中心社区，平均死亡率比较富裕地区高得多。为了找到解决这一差距和提高服务质量的办法，需要作出某些努力。卫生保健系统的根本变化是强制执行这些变化的。从宏观经济角度看，贫困问题亟待解决。经过反思，某些因素是可以理解的。个人的经济经济状况决定着人民的生活质量。社会上的贫富差距很大。这一点从医院提供的服务中可以清楚地看到。造成这一问题的根本原因是贫困和贫富差距。从个人的角度来看，这似乎是不公平的，并激发一个人找到解决这个问题的方法。应该解决社会贫困问题，为人民的成功创造一个明确的公平竞争环境。

留学 文书：贫困和卫生服务之间的关系

Hamilton neighbourhoods serve as an example for the real issues facing the people. Economic disparity and the gap between the rich and poor have been probed in detail with the context of health services offered in the neighbourhoods. Purpose of this reflection is to understand the intricate relationship between poverty and health services offered by the people. Summary and self-reflections for the same has been investigated in this analysis. Insightful observation that has been understood from this essay is that there is a certain link between poverty and health services. Analysis of this neighbourhood provides the issues facing the societies across the spectrum. Many reports bolster this fundamental argument. Hamilton neighbourhoods prove that heath services are offered to the people based on their wealth. There is a growing economic disparity amongst the people owing to which the quality of fundamental services offered to the people varies. This can be understood by using housing prices as an indicator. The Flamborough neighbourhood around Carlisle is found priced at an average of $490,000. In the inner city Hamilton near steel mills the average rate of houses was 89000$ according to 2006.Subsequent to this, people born in poorer neighbourhoods have start disadvantages.

留学 文书：贫困和卫生服务之间的关系
Their economic status is not because of laziness but a combination of factors. Owing to this factor the amount spent on hospital also varied 34 Million dollar variation was found in this case. This shows that there are limited resources in inner city hospitals. In the poorer inner city neighbourhoods the average mortality rate is considerably higher than the richer areas. In order to find a solution for this disparity and to improve the quality of services, certain efforts need to be undertaken. Fundamental changes in the health care system are mandatory to implement the changes. From a macroeconomic angle, poverty issues need to be addressed.On Reflection certain factors can be understood. Economic financial status of individuals decides the quality of life of the people. There is a large gap between the rich and the poor in the society. This is seen clearly in the services rendered by the hospitals. Root cause of this issue is poverty and the gap between the rich and poor. From a personal standpoint this seems unfair and provokes a person to find a solution for this issue. Poverty in society should be addressed and there should be a clear level playing field for the people to succeed.

加拿大论文代写：华沙经济繁荣的原因

在： ,

加拿大论文代写：华沙经济繁荣的原因

1989/90年后，经济和政治变革席卷波兰。结果，华沙的经济因为健康的外国直接投资(FDI)流动而繁荣起来。华沙是波兰的主要受益者，30%的进入波兰的外国直接投资最终到达华沙。主要受益者是金融服务、保险公司、银行等行业。一个主要的外国直接投资流量是大宇选择华沙作为其新的总部。华沙的优势是相当稳定的经济和政治条件，使其能够进入波兰市场以及独联体国家和波罗的海国家的市场。其他优势还包括伦敦金融城成为东欧和中欧的金融中心。此外，华沙作为波兰的首都，拥有170万人口和较高的教育水平，比其他波兰城市享有优势。它已成为现代工业的中心，拥有相当良好的基础设施和非常良好的电信网络。外国投资有助于展示经济转型。私有化开始得很快，人口翻了一番，企业也翻了三倍。由此产生的情况表明，华沙有可能在工资水平和经济实力方面进一步稳定其领先城市的地位。

加拿大论文代写：华沙经济繁荣的原因
由于华沙的经济繁荣，人们首先看到的结果是办公空间的增加。然而，由于城市的结构，新的办公大楼的位置遇到了问题。这座城市的某些方面反映了过去的遗产:二战期间华沙几乎被完全摧毁。老城区的建筑物都是按照原来的样子重建的。这座城市的其他地方都被预制的公寓楼所覆盖。社会主义时代的新市中心出现在西南，靠近文化科学宫和中央车站。为了促进城市的重建，城市的整个地区被国有化了。这样做的原因是政府拥有该地区所有的房地产。这使得当局可以不考虑土地价格来规划新的城市(Petrakos, 2001)。城市建设稀疏，其原因是文化宫周边区域发展不发达，空间宽敞，市中心街道宽阔，交通拥堵。如果能增加自由空间的利用，城市结构可以得到显著改善。

加拿大论文代写：华沙经济繁荣的原因

After 1989/90, the economic and political changes swept Poland. As a consequence, the economy of Warsaw saw a boom because of healthy FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) flow. Warsaw was the main beneficiary in Poland as thirty percent of all FDIs entering Poland ended up in reaching Warsaw. The major beneficiaries were financial services, insurance companies, banks, and other sectors. One major FDI flow had been Daewoo that selected Warsaw as their new headquarter. The advantages of Warsaw had been a reasonably stable economic and political condition that provided the access to the Poland’s market as well as the markets of the CIS states and the Baltic countries. Other advantages include the city becoming financial capital of Eastern and Central Europe. Moreover, Warsaw enjoyed advantages over other Polish cities as it had the status of being the capital of the country, having a population of 1.7 million and having high education standard. It has been the hub of modern industries equipped with reasonably good infrastructure with a very good network of telecommunication. The foreign investments helped to showcase the economic transformation. The set out of the privatization was rapid, doubling its population, and tripling its businesses. The resultant picture revealed Warsaw with a possibility of further stabilizing its position of a leading city in terms of general level of wages and economic power.

加拿大论文代写：华沙经济繁荣的原因
The result that was seen first because of the economic boom, in the Warsaw, had been the office space increase. However, the structure of the city as result of the new office towers’ locations encountered problems. There had been aspects about the city that reflected past legacies: the near total destruction of Warsaw during the Second World War. The buildings of the old town had been rebuilt as per their appearances that were originally in place. The rest of the city was covered with apartment blocks that were prefabricated. The socialist era’s new city centre had come up in the south west in the proximity of the Palace of Culture and Science and the central station. In facilitating the rebuild of the city, the city’s entire area was nationalized. The reason for such a step was the owning of all real estate in the area by the government. This enabled the authorities of not considering the land prices to plan the new city (Petrakos, 2001). The built of the city is sparsely, the reason for which, the areas that surrounds the Palace of Culture has been featured with undeveloped and spacious area, wide streets in the area of city centre, which are congested with through traffic. The city structure can be markedly improved, if the utilization of the free spaces can be increased.

jianada：人们进行迁移的原因

在： ,

jianada：人们进行迁移的原因

人们从一个地区迁移到另一个地区有几个原因，主要是经济、政治、社会和环境(Bitesize, 2014)。经济原因主要围绕着寻找更好的工资或更好的工作;政治原因来自于一个压迫人民的不友好的或专制的政府;社会原因包括寻找更好的生活质量，这与寻找更好的工资和更好的工作密切相关，但也与寻找一个能更好地满足生活需要的地方有关;环境方面的原因包括逃避自然/人为灾害，即从较易受灾地区转移到较不容易受灾地区。有几种迁移模型，其中最流行的是John R. Harris和Michael Todaro在1970年开发的Harris-Todaro迁移模型。这个模型确定工资是决定移民趋势的主要因素。在详细研究哈里斯-托达罗模型所建立的移民趋势之前，有必要了解劳动力市场的运作情况。劳动力市场上劳动力的供求关系决定了工人的工资水平。

jianada：人们进行迁移的原因
如果劳动力的需求更多而供给更少，该地区的工资就会更高。通常，城市地区的工资较高，因为城市地区的生活成本较高。因此，在城市和农村地区存在工资差异。然而，如果劳动力供应增加，工资率就会下降，因为人们将准备以更低的工资工作。如果跨城乡迁移即城市农村之间的内部或不同状态考虑,当工资差别或工资的差异在农村和城市地区之间是正的,人们往往从农村转移到城市地区为了寻找更好的工作,更高的薪水和更好的生活机会获得更好的医疗设施,美好家园》等等。当城镇地区的工资数量增加时，供需的相互作用导致工资下降，直到最终达到零。这导致了农村和城市地区的均衡(Harris & Todaro, 1970)。哈里斯-托达罗移民模型只考虑了工资。

jianada：人们进行迁移的原因

People migrate from one region to another owing to several reasons, the major ones being economic, political, social and environmental (Bitesize, 2014). The economic reasons mainly revolve around the search of better wages or better work; the political reasons come from an unfriendly or tyrannical government which oppresses the population; the social reasons involve the search of a better quality of life which is closely related to the search of better wages and better jobs but also relates to search of a place that offers better access to the needs of life; and the environmental reasons involve escaping of natural/ man-made disasters entailing shifting from a more disaster-prone region to a less disaster-prone region.There have been several models of migration, the most popular of which was the Harris-Todaro model of migration developed by John R. Harris and Michael Todaro in 1970. This model identifies the wage to be the major factor determining migration trends. Before going into the details of migration trends as established by Harris-Todaro Model, it is essential to understand the functioning of the labour market.The demand and supply of labour in the labour market determines the wage of the workers.

jianada：人们进行迁移的原因
If the demand of the labour is more while supply is less, the wage will be higher in that area. Usually, the wages are higher in the urban areas because the cost of living is higher in the urban areas. So, there exists a wage differential between the urban and the rural areas. If, however, the supply of labour is more, the wage rate would fall as people will be ready to work for lesser wages. If migration across rural and urban areas i.e. internally between rural urban areas or different states be taken into consideration, when the wage differential or the difference in wage between the rural and the urban areas is positive, people tend to move from rural to urban areas in search of better jobs, better wages and better lifestyle opportunities like access to better healthcare facilities, better homes and so on. When the number of wages in the urban areas increases, the interplay of supply and demand leads to a decline in the wages until such time when the gap finally reaches zero. This leads to equilibrium across the rural and the urban areas (Harris & Todaro, 1970). The Harris-Todaro model of migration takes into account simply the wage.