論文代寫:海灣輪渡服務

論文代寫:海灣輪渡服務
海灣渡輪服務公司進行的市場調查發現,來自美國的乘客數量大幅增加。增加的交通量可為政府及渡輪營辦商帶來利潤,如提供額外服務,所得收入可由政府及服務營辦商瓜分。由於設施的改善,乘客可能要支付服務費。這種服務可能與功利主義理論有關,後者將任何決定與快樂最大化聯繫在一起。

論文代寫:海灣輪渡服務
賦予各部門的責任和生態養護條款對經營者肯定是有利的,因為他們對道路養護的遵守較少。此外,遵循環境條款將使他們提供更好的服務,通過提高審美情趣,從而增加他們的底線。上述各有關當局分擔責任的影響,將大大減輕政府本身的壓力,同時大大提高乘客的服務質素。

論文代寫:海灣輪渡服務

The market research conducted by the Bay Ferries services observed a considerable increase in the number of passengers from America. The increased traffic can lead to profits for both the government and the ferry operator if added services are offered, the income from which can be divided between the government and the service operator. The passengers are likely to pay for the service charges owing to better facilities. Such services can be related to the utilitarian theory that links any decision to the maximization of pleasure.

論文代寫:海灣輪渡服務
The delegation of responsibilities on the various departments and the clauses provided for ecological maintenance would definitely be beneficial for the operator, as they would have to be less observant of the traffic ways maintenance. Furthermore, following the environmental clauses would result in them providing a better service to the passengers by improving the aesthetic appeal, and thereby increasing their bottom-line.The above impacts of the sharing of responsibilities among the relevant authorities would considerably lower the pressure on the government alone, while substantially increasing the quality of services for the passengers.

ps代写:大麻合法化的讨论

ps代写:大麻合法化的讨论

有一些关键利益攸关方参与了围绕使用这种物质的合法性或非法性的辩论。在这种情况下有四个主要的涉众。首先,它包括一般公众,其中包括物质的可能使用者。这部分利益相关者一直在呼吁大麻的使用合法化。这一点从公众呼吁立法机构将大麻合法化和合法化的推动中就可以明显看出(Brown, Temple, Hammersley, & Laar, 2015)。第二,包括政府在内的立法和政治力量是一个主要的利益攸关方,无法明确界定其立场。虽然有人试图将这种物质的使用合法化,但却未能明确确立大麻使用合法化的法律或规范。

ps代写:大麻合法化的讨论
在这个问题上,政治阶层的分歧非常大,因为同样清楚的是,有必要达成共识。尽管大多数政党都明确表示应该允许医用大麻,但在将这种物质用于娱乐目的方面存在一些分歧(Brown, Temple, Hammersley & Laar, 2015)。第三,必须考虑到医疗界和病人的需要,其中以医疗救济为理由要求接受使用大麻。这种使用将意味着允许控制和有限地使用大麻用于医疗和救济的目的。医学界一直呼吁立即对使用大麻进行补贴,以达到治疗和缓解措施的目的(Fischer, Rehm & Hall, 2009)。

ps代写:大麻合法化的讨论

There are a number of key stakeholders who are involved in the debate which revolves around the legality or illegality of the use of such substance. There are four main stakeholders in this case. Firstly, it includes the general public which includes the possible users of the substance. This section of the stakeholders had been calling for the legalization of the use of marijuana. This is evident from the push of the general public to call upon their legislators to bring law for the decriminalization and legalization of the use of marijuana (Brown, Temple, Hammersley, & Laar, 2015).Secondly, the legislative and political forces which include the government have been a major stakeholder which has not been able to clearly demarcate its stand. While there has been some attempt to decriminalize the use of such substance, it has not been able to clearly establish law or norms for the legalization of the use of marijuana.

ps代写:大麻合法化的讨论
The political class has been extremely divided over this matter as the same makes it clear that there is a need to have consensus. While most of the political parties make it clear that the medical use of marijuana should be allowed, there have been some differences on the use of such substance for recreational purpose (Brown, Temple, Hammersley & Laar, 2015).Thirdly, needs of the medical community and patients have to be taken into regard wherein the use of marijuana is being called for acceptance on the grounds of medical relief. This kind of use would mean allowing controlled and limited use of marijuana for the purpose of medical treatment and relief. The medical community has been calling for immediate allowance of the use of marijuana for the purpose of treatment and relief measures (Fischer, Rehm & Hall, 2009).