论文代写：电影批判性分析

在： ,

论文代写：电影批判性分析

在电影的另一个场景中，溥仪不停地坐在他的龙王座上坐下来，因为他跳了起来，跑向房间的门。一开始他被巨大的帷幔遮住，后面还有成千上万的排队叩头的皇帝。在电影中，当溥仪还在宝座上时，总有一个人在他的头上。他从紫禁城出来的场景之一就是一个很大的讽刺。在现场，他被证明在他的土地上穿着西装和香烟，他被证明靠在一架钢琴上。

电影的后半部分描绘了PU Yi和他妻子的野蛮状态。皇后成为一名鸦片成瘾者和一名女同性恋者，并与一名女同性恋日本人发展关系。显示皇帝过着堕落的生活。当共产党接管对中国的控制权时，一切都变了。在这一幕之后，观众们期望共产党人应该对溥仪判处死刑，但是他接受了再教育。提供的理由是，他不知道他的任何活动是把鞋子绑上还是关上水龙头。在最后看到，他很乐意作为一个园丁，复制那个积极为他的劳教。这部电影描述了皇帝的生活除非受过教育，否则是无用的和无关紧要的。因此，电影载有重要的教育信息。

因此，电影的结束顺序是意想不到的。在这一幕中，溥仪被带到参观为游客开放的紫禁城。皇帝观察到一个年轻的男孩坐在龙椅上。

论文代写：电影批判性分析

In an another scene of the movie, Pu Yi goes restless by sitting on his Dragon Throne continuously and due to the same he jumps of the seat and runs towards the door of the room. He is obstructed by the vast drapery at first followed by thousands of minions of the emperor who are lined up to kowtow him. Further in the movie, when Pu Yi remains on the throne, there is always a person over his head. One of the scene, where he is thrown out of the Forbidden City represents a great irony. In the scene, he is shown to wear a western dress with a cigarette in his land and he is shown to be leaning on a piano.

The latter half of the movie depicts the brutal condition of PU Yi and his wife. Empress becomes an opium addict and a lesbian and develops a relationship with a lesbian Japanese. The emperor is shown to be living a life of depravity. Everything changes around him when the communists takes over the control over China. After this scene, a viewer expects that the communists should sentence Pu Yi to death, but then he is reeducated. The reason which is provided is that, he does not know any of his activities right from tying his shoes or turning off the tap. In the final seen he is happy to work as a gardener which replicates that being reeducated works positively for him. The movie depicts that how the life of the emperor is made useless and irrelevant unless he is educated. Thus, the movie carries a message of importance of education.

Thus, the ending sequence of the movie is something which is unexpected. In this scene, Pu Yi is shown to visit the Forbidden City which has been opened for the tourists. The emperor observes that a Young Boy sits on the Dragon Throne.

 

新西兰航空航天工程学论文代写：无人驾驶飞机

在： ,

新西兰航空航天工程学论文代写：无人驾驶飞机

无人机或从技术上讲，空中无人驾驶飞行器（UAV）是一种 遥控飞机（RPA）可没有一个飞行员乘坐。这种无人机的飞行是由车载电脑自动控制或由地面上或通过支持试点 帮助（华和参孙，2009）。美国的 联邦航空管理局已命名为无人机这样的飞机和用它主要用于军事和战争的目的。在个人以及在国家层面上，政府已经建立了用户操作无人机在美国由FAA规定的严格的政策，用户必须首先获得一个 授权 证书（COA）才可以操作无人机。除了直接通过美国领空执行的FAA认证外，美国政府为执法目的而使用无人机的规定一直只在国家一级确定（克莱默，2011）。美国有22多个州执行了这项立法，涉及使用无人驾驶飞机系统以及处理他们收集的数据。美国的国内政策规定，政府必须签发一项无人机系统，用于监视和军事用途。

根据月2013日狄金森州立大学的研究，它是通过一个调查表明，超过46%的美国选民相信的事实，对U.S.A政府使用一致的无人机攻击住在国外的无辜市民肯定是非法的发现。从这一假设中可以清楚地看出，美国公众认为，公民在试图抓住恐怖分子时不应受到影响，这当然不是正确的战略。在国际一级，美国政府利用无人驾驶飞机追踪恐怖分子和武装分子的战略受到了巨大的批评。

新西兰航空航天工程学论文代写：无人驾驶飞机

A Drone or technically speaking an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) which can be used without a human pilot aboard. The flight of such drones is either controlled automatically by onboard computers or by the help of a pilot on the ground or through a supporting vehicle (Hua & Samson, 2009). The Federal aviation administration of the USA has named such aircrafts as drones and has used it mainly for military and warfare purposes. At an individual as well as at a state level, the government has set a rigid policy for users to operate drones in the USA. As stated by the FAA, users have to first obtain a Certificate of Authorization (COA) before they can operate a drone. Apart from the FAA certification which operates directly through USA airspace, the regulation for the usage of drones by the government of USA for law enforcement purposes has always been determined merely at a state level (Kramer, 2011). More than 22 USA states have implemented the legislation which has addressed the use of drone systems as well as the handling of data which is collected by them. The domestic policy of the USA states that a probable cause of warrant must be issued by the government for a drone system which can be used for surveillance and military purposes.

According to a research by Fairleigh Dickinson University in Feb 2013, it was found through a poll that more than 46% of American voters believe in the fact that it is certainly illegal for the government of the U.S.A to use consistent drone attacks to innocent citizens living abroad. It is certainly clear from this assumption that the public of the USA thinks that citizens should not be affected when trying to get the terrorists and this is certainly not the right strategy. On an international level, there has been immense criticism of the strategy of the government of USA on its use of drones to track as well as kill terrorist groups and militants.