加拿大摄影学论文代写：《别人的生活》

加拿大摄影学论文代写：《别人的生活》

这是不道德的报告任何个人或任何团体的活动，因为个人原因，另一个人（spiritualityandpractice.com）。Dreyman曾亲共产主义观点和他对国际水平的认可因此他逃脱政府的审查。Hempf试图诱骗Dreyman让他的路径西兰清晰的方式。然而Wiesler在背后调查不明真相。
这显示了德国社会的不道德的条件。文化部长只是用他周围的人来为他个人的事。他是操纵他人，用自己的能力参与西兰。
进一步在影片中，当Wielser和古比兹回到斯塔西总部，Wielser被告知，他已被降职，他的职业生涯已经毁了。Wielser是一个谁把打字机从Dreyman的公寓里，为了帮助他。Dreyman只是以反对东德，是导致自杀率增加的条件下站。Wiesler实现对Dreyman不正当行为试图帮助他。这是由Wielser进行了高度的道德行为（法国）。
尽管Wielser的性格已经表现出道德行为和多层次思考，他失去了他的地位和他的职业生涯的影响。
若干年后，高强，Dreyman相遇，Dreyman得知他的活动总是监视。这个消息震惊了，Dreyman去了史塔西记录机构了解他的活动。他发现大多数关于他的活动的信息是不正确的，在第二搜索西兰付诸行动，所以她没有参与消除打字机发布（spiritualityandpractice.com）。Dreyman意识到，Wiesler曾帮助他。Dreyman充满了感激之情，所以他把自己的新书Wielser。
这部电影的最后一部分反映了社会的伦理视角。当人们互相帮助，通过残酷的时代，没有名利或物质财富的贪婪，那么唯一的道德行动是回报他们的青睐，无论是表达感激或给予他们的回报（法国）。这就是Dreymandid；他返回的青睐，通过把他的书给Wiesler表示他的感激。

加拿大摄影学论文代写：《别人的生活》

It is unethical to report any individual’s or any group’s activities to another person for personal reasons (Spiritualityandpractice.com). Dreyman had pro-Communist views and he was recognized on international levels thus he escaped state scrutiny. Hempf was seeking ways to trap Dreyman so that his path to Sieland was clear. However Wiesler was unaware of the truth behind the investigation.

This shows the unethical conditions of German society. The Minister of Culture is only using the people around him for his personal matters. He is manipulating others and is using their abilities to get involved with Sieland.

Further in the film, when Wielser and Grubitz come back to the Stasi headquarters, Wielser is informed that he has been demoted and his career had ruined. Wielser was the one who had removed the typewriter from Dreyman’s apartment in order to help him. Dreyman was only taking a stand against conditions in East Germany which were leading to increase in suicides. Wiesler realizing the unfair practices against Dreyman tries to help him. This is a highly ethical behavior carried out by Wielser (French).

Even though Wielser’s character has demonstrated ethical behavior and thinking at several levels, he loses his position and his career is affected.

After some years, Hempf and Dreyman encounter each other where Dreyman learns that his activities were always monitored. Shocked by this news, Dreyman goes to Stasi Records Agency to learn about his activities. He finds out that most of the information about his activities was incorrect and Sieland was released before the second search was put into action so she was not involved in removing the typewriter(Spiritualityandpractice.com).Dreyman realizes that Wiesler had helped him. Dreyman was filled with gratitude, so he dedicates his new book to Wielser.

This last part of the film reflects the ethical perspective of the society. When people assist one another through harsh times without the greed for fame or material possessions then the only ethical action is to return their favor either by expressing gratitude or by awarding them something in return(French). This is what Dreymandid; he returned the favor by showing his gratitude through dedicating his book to Wiesler.