加拿大雷湾论文代写：城市状态
加拿大雷湾论文代写：城市状态
自由主义已经在世界各地的主要是由于其公平选举的过程中，意识形态影响最深的城市公民的权利，提供和接受所有的宗教和自由选择宗教信仰，并以公平的方式进行自由贸易（莱科，1992）和提供新闻自由。在某种程度上，所有的人都是政治思想家，他们思考“正义”、“权利”、“平等”、“公平”和“自由”（海伍德，1992）。这意味着，即使人们不知道某一政治哲学，他们在不知不觉中遵循任何一种哲学。人们所使用的上述词语与自由主义的意识形态相似。它给了人们很多自由选择自己的宗教，贸易和生活方式。这些与选择自由相对应的属性，是分配给那些能够使他们喜欢的城市的人所享有的最高自由。马克思主义有很大的贡献，同时，因为，当自由主义一直是一个歉意的有关资本制度作为一个系统，马克思已在一个更为关键的有关资本主义（加尔通，1978）。因此，自由主义有助于城市自身的发展，马克思主义为提高竞争力提供了重要的建议。
城市状态时通过自由主义思想趋于开放由于处事和宽松自由的方式开展业务。
有肯定的城市和穷人之间的鸿沟的存在，因为行动的自由选择，这鼓励富人剥削穷人。
罗尔斯（1999）强调政治自由的不可交易和牺牲，随着信仰自由的人自由和公民自由。
这实际上是人们不能自由平等的政治参与。
加拿大雷湾论文代写：城市状态
Liberalism has had the deepest effect on the cities around the world primarily due to its ideology of fair election process, civil rights, providing and accepting all religion and freedom to choose a religion, and conducting free trade in a fair way (Raico, 1992) and providing freedom of press. In a way all people are political thinkers as they think about ‘justice’, ‘rights’, ‘equality’, ‘fairness’, and ‘freedom’ (Heywood, 1992). This implies that even if people are unaware about a particular political philosophy, they unknowingly follow any one of the philosophy. The above words used by people are similar to the ideology of Liberalism. It has given much freedom to people in cities to select their own religion, trade, and way of living. These attributes corresponding to the freedom of choice is the highest freedom allotted to people with which they can make the city of their liking. Marxism has much to contribute as well, because, when liberalism has been an apologetically relating to the capital system as one single system, Marxism has been relating capitalism in a more critical way (Galtung, 1978). Thus Liberalism helps cities to develop in their own way and Marxism provides critical suggestions to enhance their competitiveness.
The urban condition when thought through liberalism tends to be more open due to the liberal way of doing things and conducting business liberally.
There has certainly an existence of a divide between the urban and the poor because of liberal selection of actions, which has encouraged the rich to exploit the poor.
Rawls (1999) emphasizes that political liberty must not be traded and sacrificed with and for freedom of people and civil liberties along with the freedom of conscience.
This is in effect as people are not able to participate freely and equally in political affairs.
