代写thesis

加拿大航空航天工程学论文代写:坠机事件

加拿大航空航天工程学论文代写:坠机事件

坠机事件发生后立即,许多个人,新闻的公司,并在情况如NTSB开始寻找事故的根本原因,不同的利益相关者。在事件发生时,许多猜测浮出水面是什么原因造成的实际事件。在最初的猜测,机械误差据说是根本原因(GRED,2013)。过了一段时间后,赫芬顿邮报在其网站上发布了一份报告说,坠毁是由自动油门机制的故障,这可能没有提供足够的动力主机中止着陆。到那时,NTSB调查已经排除了由机械误差引起的崩溃的可能性。然而,当时大部分的猜测都把飞机失事的责任归咎于214航班的飞行员。一些猜测表明飞机驾驶员缺乏经验。然而,韩亚航空公司官方发言人拒绝这样的声明说,飞行员有上千小时的飞行经验(琼,2013)。而它的原因仍然还不清楚,国家运输安全委员会也发表声明,当时失事是由飞机没有得到足够的电力中断登陆造成浏览器崩溃。

而NTSB报告需要相当长的一段时间提供确切的结论到底是什么原因导致的崩溃。有些事情当时已经知道了。在失事当天,214号航班采取了航空业所谓的“硬着陆”,而着陆跑道之前还不多见。得出的结论是,飞行214实际上是飞行速度比所需的着陆速度慢,它走得更远,因为它达到阈值。飞机在离跑道80英尺远的地方坠毁了。根据韩亚航空公司和美国国家运输安全委员会的报告提供的数据,死亡和受伤的发生最关键的人坐在214航班的后端(威廉,2013)。NTSB已经延期2013年12月11日审理而发表的声明,调查尚未得出结论。

加拿大航空航天工程学论文代写:坠机事件

Instantly after the crash incident took place, many individuals, news companies, and different stakeholders in the situation such as the NTSB started looking for the root cause of the crash. At the time of the incident, many speculations surfaced regarding what caused the actual incident. In the initial speculations, mechanical errors were rumored to be the root cause(Gred, 2013). After some time, the Huffington Post posted a report on its website that said that the crash was caused by the malfunctioning of auto throttle mechanism, which probably did not provide enough power to the main engines to abort the landing. By that time, the NTSB investigation has ruled out the possibility of the crash being caused by a mechanical error. However, most parts of the speculations at the time were placing the blame of the crash on the pilots of the flight 214. Some speculations were made to suggest that the pilots of the plane were very inexperienced. However, the Asiana Airlines official spokesperson rejected such statements and said that both the pilots had thousands of hours of flying experience(Joan, 2013). While the reason for it wasn’t still clear, NTSB did made the statement at the time that the crash was caused by the plane not receiving enough power to abort the landing and ended up crashing.

While the NTSB report takes quite some time to provide exact conclusion about what really caused the crash. Some things were already known at the time. The flight 214, at the day of the crash, took what is called in the airlines industry a “hard landing” and it was little before the landing strip(Brigham, 2013). It was concluded that the flight 214 was actually flying on speed slower than the required landing speed and it went further slower as it reached the threshold. The plane finally crashed when it was still 80 feet short of the landing strip. As per the data provided by Asiana Airlines and the NTSB reports, the fatalities and most critical injuries occurred to people who were sitting in the rear end of the flight 214(William, 2013). The NTSB has adjourned the hearing about the case on 11 December 2013 while made the statement that the investigation was yet to conclude.