新西兰音乐学论文代写
新西兰音乐学论文代写:美国和中国的教育系统
增加公众的压力感觉的学生提高他们的分数测试主要在案件时发现的负面影响将会有更多的选择由儿童由于这个系统。
观察到的缩小课程是由一些老师在高股份的情况。一些学校关注的方法提高他们的考试成绩直接通过改变课程在很大程度上导致使课程更有效。在同一时间觉得课程是缩小与其他院校。这是观察到的主要变化是由小地区的学校课程,甚至在指令模式进行了调整。老师通常不会觉得更改完全支持和兴趣的学生。的指令序列和内容非常高股份测试的影响。作为测试的日期开始接近直接工作是由影响考试成绩的学校增加。
结论:
美国的教育制度仍然面临不平等教育在公立学校。这个失败的教育制度背后的事实是,当地学校的资金分配自己的学区是这样完成的,它只影响穷人和少数民族学生。约50%的公立学校的运营成本是由全国地方学区。预算实践教育有一个更大,直接影响教育系统相比,美国州政府和联邦政府所做的投资。现有的联邦立法间接支持资金由当地地区学校。
新西兰音乐学论文代写:美国和中国的教育系统
An increased public pressure is felt on the students for improving their scores of tests mainly in cases when it is perceived that there will be more of negative impacts on the choices made by children due to this system.
It was observed that the narrowing of the curriculum was reported by some teachers in the high stake situations. Few schools focused on ways for improving their test scores directly by altering the curriculum to a large extent that resulted in making the curriculum more effective. On the same time it was felt that the curriculum was narrowed in comparison to other colleges. It was observed that major changes were made by schools in smaller district in the curriculum and even adjustments were made in instruction patterns. Teachers normally do not feel that the changes made were completely in favor and interests of students. The sequences of instructions and the content were highly affected by the high stake testing. As the date for tests start approaching direct efforts is made by the schools for affecting test scores increases.
Conclusion:
The educational system of America still confronts the inequality in education in public schools. The fact behind this unsuccessful education system is that the allocation of funding of local schools by own school districts is done in such way that it affects only poor and minority students. Around 50% operating costs of public schools is accounted by the nationwide local school districts. The budgeting practices for education have a greater and direct impact on the educational system of U.S. in comparison to the investments done by the state and federal governments. The existing federal legislation indirectly supports the funding done by local district schools.
It was observed that the narrowing of the curriculum was reported by some teachers in the high stake situations. Few schools focused on ways for improving their test scores directly by altering the curriculum to a large extent that resulted in making the curriculum more effective. On the same time it was felt that the curriculum was narrowed in comparison to other colleges. It was observed that major changes were made by schools in smaller district in the curriculum and even adjustments were made in instruction patterns. Teachers normally do not feel that the changes made were completely in favor and interests of students. The sequences of instructions and the content were highly affected by the high stake testing. As the date for tests start approaching direct efforts is made by the schools for affecting test scores increases.
Conclusion:
The educational system of America still confronts the inequality in education in public schools. The fact behind this unsuccessful education system is that the allocation of funding of local schools by own school districts is done in such way that it affects only poor and minority students. Around 50% operating costs of public schools is accounted by the nationwide local school districts. The budgeting practices for education have a greater and direct impact on the educational system of U.S. in comparison to the investments done by the state and federal governments. The existing federal legislation indirectly supports the funding done by local district schools.
